Jump to content

Recommended Posts

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well yes tony...i am sure if you were held up at

> knife point, alone in the dark by some nutter, you

> would not piss your pants, oh no you'd reach for

> your crayons and sketch the geezer ?


You have COMPLETELY missed my empthasis!


I have campaigned on many threads for some description whether it be the "Dog-Snatcher" or the aggressive Guy on the Bus etc...if you care to look at all these recent "alert" threads like the INfamous onwe with Black Guy and the suitcase, the other day, I said "could you add more".

That is what this article did so I reproduced it.


I was NOT being sarcastic at all, I MEANT IT LITERALLY! so YOUR sarcasm is way off the mark AfN.

It's a bit odd this one because it is a "re-appeal" for information by the police that seems to have been picked up heavily by the regional press as well as being covered by the Standard article. It would appear, given the regional coverage, that British Transport Police think that the perp may no longer be in the area. I might, of course, be wrong.


The most recent offence was November 2007.

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He is white, of slim build, about 6ft tall and

> with brown hair.

>

> Most of the attacks were carried out at North

> Dulwich and East Dulwich stations

>

> There's a helpful description.


xxxxxxx


There was a picture of him in one of the free papers


Edit: Oooops sorry Eliza hadn't seen your post :-$

Missed point ? ...


I was not being sarcastic as i thought you were being serious ? ....and no being confronted by a stranger with bootfetish and suitcase, with knife and intent or running across the rye with you pitbull in a bag often means.....no other description than the one they offer !!!


or photofit of man resembling a martian who bears a likeness to an x boyfriend who you still subconsciously have never forgiven for sleeping with your best friends mum !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No they aren't. You're coming across as a smug, superior liberal, and that's what old fashioned voters (labour, Cons and now Reform) hate. That 'the deplorables' 'they're all ignorant racists' line is what's driving people away from the traditional parties and towards Reform.  You're as guilty of looking back as Labour. This is a new, post-europe world and we all need to come to terms with that, make do with what we have, and move forward.       
    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...