Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bonniebird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me it's all about the bangs and noise, I am

> worrying about things that matter edcam, it

> matters to me and I count.


On the scale of things that matter I think most would rate this pretty low down.

mako Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has this petition been started by a clever

> marketing company who want a mailing list of a

> certain type?


According to the petition it was started by a woman who is a dog owner and trainer.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm totally bored with the nightly fireworks too,

> but surely the existing laws on environmental

> health / noise / pollution / antisocial behaviour

> are enough for the Council to act if they get

> complaints? Banning them would just be criticised

> as more nanny state, and the injuries are unlikely

> to be high enough to make it a priority anyway, so

> I'm not convinced this is a realistic way to

> tackle the situation.


In my opinion, and more than 24,000 other people, the laws are not adequate. I was gobsmacked when I realised how lax they were when I researched them recently. If the petition allows them to be redrawn so they are more stringent, then I think that is a good thing.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mako Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Has this petition been started by a clever

> > marketing company who want a mailing list of a

> > certain type?

>

> According to the petition it was started by a

> woman who is a dog owner and trainer.


Is that not what the marketing company would say to get their group?

Perhaps it is a really clever move from a fireworks company as despite not being that keen on fireworks, it has given me a strong urge to go and mindlessly set some off in my garden.

24,000 not really a significamnt number in relation to the literally millions who spend their hard earned on fireworks/go to displays.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Going to displays is different than letting them

> off mindlessly in your back garden as long as they

> are supervised or done by competent people.


What about going to a display in a competent persons garden. Surely this is ok

When I was a youngster, every corner shop sold fireworks. It was easy for kids to get hold of them. Hundreds of them ended up in hospitals after accidents. The government made campaign adverts on health and safety around fireworks, it was that big a problem. Every other street lit a bonfire and the fire brigade were overstretched trying to put out the ones that got out of control. So to say current laws are inadaquate is just BS. They were made in reaction to real issues with fireworks.


We live in a city of 6.5 milion people. There will be NOISE. There are far more serious things to campaign for than some killjoy crusade over a few fireworks let off in the privacy of someones own garden over a few weeks of the year.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I was a youngster, every corner shop sold

> fireworks. It was easy for kids to get hold of

> them. Hundreds of them ended up in hospitals after

> accidents. The government made campaign adverts on

> health and safety around fireworks, it was that

> big a problem. Every other street lit a bonfire

> and the fire brigade were overstretched trying to

> put out the ones that got out of control. So to

> say current laws are inadaquate is just BS. They

> were made in reaction to real issues with

> fireworks.

>

> We live in a city of 6.5 milion people. There will

> be NOISE. There are far more serious things to

> campaign for than some killjoy crusade over a few

> fireworks let off in the privacy of someones own

> garden over a few weeks of the year.



Noise is subjectve - Fireworks that sound like rockets and bombs going off for more than an hour are torture. A pretty display with a bit of wooshing is different, noisewise, and possibly safety wise.


After reading the laws on fireworks, I cannot see how they are better than they were before, whatever they were before. Nothing to stop older kids buying them for younger ones. Even if they are only sold on a few days a year, then there isn't anything to stop people stockpiling them to set off at other times. The current laws allow fireworks to be let off for 16+ hours a day.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The government made campaign adverts on

> health and safety around fireworks, it was that

> big a problem.




Even as a 36 year old man I still feel quite nervous of sparklers since the ad in the 80s where the girl picked one up off the floor and ended up with her hand all bandaged up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
    • Well according to a newspaper article, Gail’s is opening 10 shops in London,,, yup Dulwich is named 10/5 I seem to recall with others in London opening at 7 am…!, Guess that is to capture workers coming off all night shift. Offering free mince pies until they run out.. So very sad to hear about Romeo Jones… been a customer since the opening, any idea where Patrick has gone or details… please pm me.    What is going to be in its place…. Will be around in Jan…umm village is changing….
    • interesting the police said "the car was in demand at the moment" what make/model is that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...