Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I eat rice cakes.


They're usually somewhere between around 85p and ?1.20 a packet, depending where you buy them.


The other day I went into Somerfield. They had two kinds (same brand, same size) - sesame and plain.


The sesame ones were around a quid.


The plain ones had a big notice "Low Fat" and the price had shot up to ?1.50.


The thing is - all rice cakes are low fat! They're just made of, er, rice.


There's nothing you could do to them to make them lower in fat than they already are.


Rip-off or what?


(6)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5195-east-dulwich-rip-offs/
Share on other sites

Not sure whether citing a Somerfield price fix can be fairly represented as an 'East Dulwich rip-off' unless you have reason to believe that similar pricing doesn't apply in their other branches.


And while I too wish I could find a good and reasonable haircut around here I don't think you can cry foul just because the hairdresser doesn't cut much off. A haircut is a haircut. Cutting off a foot of hair wouldn't take much longer, it's the finish that takes the time.

VeryBerryCherry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haircuts.

>

> ?40 for a dry trim, where she only took off about

> 1cm of hair.

>


xxxxxx


A dry trim??


That really is a total rip-off.


I was always told you couldn't cut hair properly unless it was wet, and if someone tried to cut mine dry I'd walk out.


They should at least wet it to cut it even if you don't want to pay to have it washed and dried.

I think it's a bit rich that a standard bottle of Jack Daniels is ?2 more in DKH than at Forest hill Sainsbury's but I follow the simple rule that where ever you open your wallet in east Dulwich you're usually getting ripped off. Apparently posting bail at Dulwich nick is twice as much as at Lewisham police castle, the cheek.

Rental prices in East Dulwich are a joke. We moved from a two bedroom flat on the second floor to a five bedroom palace in Sevenoaks with a pond, chicken run and a massive backyard that leads onto a private park for the same amount of money. And it is only 25 mins from London Bridge.


Bargain.


Join me.... come join me.... I'm lonely.

CamberwellOz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rental prices in East Dulwich are a joke. We

> moved from a two bedroom flat on the second floor

> to a five bedroom palace in Sevenoaks with a pond,

> chicken run and a massive backyard that leads onto

> a private park for the same amount of money. And

> it is only 25 mins from London Bridge.

>

> Bargain.

>

> Join me.... come join me.... I'm lonely.




Yes, but its sevenoaks - what kind of life is that ?


whenever I go through places like this, past the nice little Italian chain resurants and nicey nicey little shops , my subconscious picks up a thousand silent screams from its residents,as the realisation begins to dawn that this idyll of suburbia is their own personal verison of hell and there is no escape until death comes calling

CamberwellOz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

We

> moved from a two bedroom flat on the second floor

> to a five bedroom palace in Sevenoaks with a pond,

> chicken run and a massive backyard that leads onto

> a private park for the same amount of money.

> Bargain.


Imagine what you could save if you were prepared to go slightly father afield?

http://www.findaproperty.com/displayprop.aspx?edid=00&salerent=0&pid=3165711

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the

> realisation begins to dawn that this idyll of

> suburbia is their own personal verison of hell and

> there is no escape until death comes calling


xxxxxx


I read that as "venison of hell" - something to do with Bambi's mother .....


:))

yeah and once you have been to the cinema (if there is one) and the one theatre (if there is one) and the few restaurants, and walked along the river, what else is there to do in these places?

It takes me more than a week to read London's Time Out, by which time the next edition comes out and I have not been out the house yet!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...