Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there. Last Sunday evening me and my mate went for a drink in East Dulwich.We went to the "Adventure bar" on Lordship lane. We bought two beers and sat at a high table and were pleasantly talking about life and family and world issues and all. The bar was completely empty. Five minutes later the barman came over and asked my mate to kindly remove his "Hoody".We thought he was joking and asked him if he was serious. Oh yes he was,he said.Now what I want to know is, is this the reason why this bar was so pitifully lacking in clientele,or is it just because of the economic woe were living through. When two fairly respectable looking Dads cant go for a drink looking kind of street an ting what is da world coming to......or at least our little corner of it.Thoughts please..................and by the by we went straight back down to the EDT where we were welcomed with open arms
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5202-adventure-bar/
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They?re dangerous I tell you. Just the other day I

> was in a rush to get out the house and put my

> hoodie on backwards. Being inexplicably blinded I

> tripped down the stairs and accidentally mugged 2

> pensioners.


HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA that gave me a proper excellent Friday giggle.. x

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5202-adventure-bar/#findComment-166337
Share on other sites

Because of the way things are this day and age, some places dont allow you to wear hats hoods or crash helmets, because of security reasons. I dont think the barman singled you out, its more than likely a company policy, and no matter who was in there they would ask you to remove an item of clothing that obscures your identity.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5202-adventure-bar/#findComment-166345
Share on other sites

I can appreciate some of the fear amongst older people that has been generated as a result of scare mongering by the tabloid press, but that really does sound way beyond the mark to be telling people in an empty bar to remove certain items of clothing. Youd never have had that 10 years or more ago in ED let me tell you! Bloody snobs!


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5202-adventure-bar/#findComment-166346
Share on other sites

Yep, this is another one of those rights versus responsibilities thangs.


He has the right to wear his hoodie.


He has the responsibility to cater for other people's sensitivities when the personal impact is insignificant.


I'm all for a society where people talk less about their rights, and contribute more constructively to their responsibilities.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5202-adventure-bar/#findComment-166574
Share on other sites

Where I grew up it was quite common for men to not be able to wear hats in pubs. Depending on where you were it could just as likely earn you a smack in the mouth as a request to leave. For the simple reason that it is actually bad manners for a man to wear a hat indoors.


Although Adventure Bar is hardly a high class establishment and I would have thought it caters for the kind of clientele who are more than likely unaware of proper manners.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5202-adventure-bar/#findComment-166635
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...