Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We're about to move, and having already paid ?160 for them to get referrences on both of us, we have now spotted this ?94 fee that they've sneaked in.


When we questioned it, they said it was for processing the contract.


Now I'm not being funny, but surely a landlord hires an agent to find them tenants, and they pay a fee for the service. I've never heard of anything like this before, am I just being naive?


What with this, and the broadband trying to charge us to END their (really not great) service, I am just getting so so fed up with being bent over and raped up the ar$e by every thieving company that wants it's pound of flesh, in return for NOTHING as far as I can make out!

We recently rented our office in dulwich keef and paid around ?270 for an admin fee, this was the same with the property before. I agree a total rip off but not sure if there are any agents that don't charge tenants like this.

Depending on the contract, I think they can charge you for the inventory either when you move in or out. Might be worth checking that.


good luck

having recently moved ourselves keef, all I can say is you aren't alone. And from looking around at various places it's not unusual either. The alternative I guess is to luck out with personal contacts or informal places on the property section


We went with an estate agents, but with eyes open and plenty of lube


In a couple of months you will hav forgotten most of this pain and wondered why you waited so long - hang on in there

Guess it's normal then, seems to be newish though, definitely wasn't the case in 2003, when I last rented a place via an estate agent.


Oh well, looks like we're going to have to pay up, but I am going to make it clear what I think and ask them to explain the charge to me, just so they can hear for themselves how full of sh!t they are.


Oh, and sorry for the metaphor used above, just angry at the way things are. It's not a lot of money in the grand scheme of things, but it just makes you want to scream!

I would do my damndest to find out who the landlord is and approach them directly.


The landlord is paying the agent to find them tenants, you're paying the agent too for some reason. So why not just not pay the thieving parasites, and put you money together to get a lawyer to draw up a contract for you.

Keef, even landlords have to be careful with agents; most contracts have a renewal fee charge, which means after the initial tenancy agreement is up, and the tenants and landlord agree to extend it, the agents will charge the landlord another 8-10% of the total annual rental income for doing nothing!...i've always been lucky to rent out privately, but when I've advertised through an agency I've always insisted this charge is omitted before I would sign up, as well as getting them to reduce their 'finders fee'...I think most tenants would benefit from renting privately too, I certainly wouldn't consider charging for checking references, inventory, contract etc, afterall it's usually only a couple of phonecalls; what gets me about the agents charging for references is that in the smallprint they say they aren't culpable if the tenants default on the rent...enjoy your new place!
Estate Agents fees are an absolute rip off for both landlord and tenant. The smaller firms are not so expensive though and they don't have as many charges. Sorry you have been burned like this Keef, you never tried Daisylets one of the sponsers of this forum either Keef?

I totally agree an utter rip off! In Australia you dont get charged any of those bullsh*t charges.. Reference checking people and processing a contract is their job so why on earth would we pay them more to bl00dy well do it! And I have to say over here my experience has been with them that they are lazy and slow so its not even like most of the time you get a good service!!


I have rented my last 3 places privately and intend to do so for as long as I possibly can as I refuse to pay those ba$tards!

Agents should (and I wish by law) charge the very minimum to the tenants. Unfortunately many agents see the tenant as another income generator. The respectable ones don't and only charge what it costs to make credit checks etc. Landlords often list property with more than one agent for letting and tenants should ask what the charges are likely to be before they start looking. Shop around, this exploitation will stop if people do.


I have to take issue with Red Devil. If an agent introduces you to a stream of income why should their fee stop after one year? Makes no sense to me although it is the subject of litigation at the moment, (can I use the F word?) Foxtons are fighting a case at the moment I think and won the last argument but i think the case continues. maybe someone out there knows more than I do (unlikely) about this.

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I totally agree an utter rip off! In Australia

> you dont get charged any of those bullsh*t

> charges.. Reference checking people and processing

> a contract is their job so why on earth would we

> pay them more to bl00dy well do it! And I have to

> say over here my experience has been with them

> that they are lazy and slow so its not even like

> most of the time you get a good service!!

>

> I have rented my last 3 places privately and

> intend to do so for as long as I possibly can as I

> refuse to pay those ba$tards!


Spot on Strawbs. Bloody Poms eh.

EDO, if the agents aren't happy they can always say no to my proposal of no renewal fee, so far this has never happened. All contracts are negotiable. It's the underhand tactics of agents in not drawing attention to these extras that p's the public off, hence Keef's original post. It's hard to negotiate if it's not clear what's on the table. One agent I thought about using made no mention of the renewal fee until I prompted him, and when I asked him where it was written into the contract, I was told I had to check out a referenced website link for general terms and conditions.

Another trick of agents is to include a clause that if the landlord was to subsequently sell the property to the tenants at any time in the future, the landlord would be liable to pay the estate agent a full sales commission e.g 2% of selling price...



EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agents should (and I wish by law) charge the very

> minimum to the tenants. Unfortunately many agents

> see the tenant as another income generator. The

> respectable ones don't and only charge what it

> costs to make credit checks etc. Landlords often

> list property with more than one agent for letting

> and tenants should ask what the charges are likely

> to be before they start looking. Shop around, this

> exploitation will stop if people do.

>

> I have to take issue with Red Devil. If an agent

> introduces you to a stream of income why should

> their fee stop after one year? Makes no sense to

> me although it is the subject of litigation at the

> moment, (can I use the F word?) Foxtons are

> fighting a case at the moment I think and won the

> last argument but i think the case continues.

> maybe someone out there knows more than I do

> (unlikely) about this.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> EDO, if the agents aren't happy they can always

> say no to my proposal of no renewal fee, so far

> this has never happened. All contracts are

> negotiable. It's the underhand tactics of agents

> in not drawing attention to these extras that p's

> the public off, hence Keef's original post. It's

> hard to negotiate if it's not clear what's on the

> table. One agent I thought about using made no

> mention of the renewal fee until I prompted him,

> and when I asked him where it was written into the

> contract, I was told I had to check out a

> referenced website link for general terms and

> conditions.

> Another trick of agents is to include a clause

> that if the landlord was to subsequently sell the

> property to the tenants at any time in the future,

> the landlord would be liable to pay the estate

> agent a full sales commission e.g 2% of selling

> price...

>

I fully agree that all contracts should be transparent, but the agent has introduced the client to a tenant and, IMHO, should pay for that during the whole length of the tenancy. It's income after all that the landlord would not have had without the agents involvement.


Likewise the sale fee seems perfectly reasonable, although I would say 2% is a bit strong. I think 1% is the norm. Again the agent has introduced a purchaser as well as a tenant and why shouldn't they be paid for that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Greg did an amazing job! He built a cabinet in my living room and added shelving. A lovely guy and perfectionist who goes the extra mile. He really understands what you want and comes up with various options to meet your price range. Would highly recommend!
    • I love the fact that virtually everyone held their hands out when furlough payments were made yet can't equate massive debt with massive cash payments to keep the economy ticking over.   
    • The problem with delivery people nowadays is that they are on such a restrictive schedule that they literally have to just try to deliver and run, otherwise they are penalised. I understand the frustration though.   And good luck making any kind of complaint to Evri. I once sold a laptop on ebay, took it to the Evri pick-up, where it was processed and it then went 'missing' between their pick-up place and the hub. Went through a long, long process where they offered me a desultory amount in compensation and I had to take them to small claims court before they came up with a fair offer the day before we were due to be in court. Long story short, Evri are shite.   Go to look at this forum for the number of people who have issues: https://nationalconsumerservice.co.uk/forum/183-postal-and-delivery-services/
    • I haven't had a rude EVRI delivery but last week I had an unexpected delivery at 10.42 pm. He didn't ring the bell or knock on the door (or rattle the letter flap) but just took a photo and put the box down.  If it hadnt been for the door camera giving us a beep we would never have known there was a parcel ready to sit there all night.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...