Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've lived a two minute walk from Le Moulin for about seven years In that time I've been - at least once - to probably every restaurant within a two mile radius (including Mr Lui's Peking Cuisine, but not including Kebab & Wine, though I've been sorely tempted). But every time I walk past Le Moulin I see the peeling paint and ignored frontage and rotten, rain-soaked, condensation ruined menu board and wonder why the owners don't pull their collective finger out and make the idea of actually walking in one night a little less unnappealing. Anyone actually ever eaten there?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/
Share on other sites

I have, although the food was average it's an experience and was overall great. Here's the post I wrote about it (from this thread)


Le Moulin (up by the Plough/Library), we went there on Valentines day and it was great (not a heart shaped balloon in sight). It's a quiet, small French restaurant run by Margaret and Eric and it's a step back in time (about 20 years). Client?le was generally 50ish and regulars ("bottle of the usual white please Margaret"). Decor is pleasantly brown but it's very clean and they obviously look after the place. Food was OK, had a rack of lamb which was pleasant but the fact the protruding bones had those little, white, paper things on them that looked like small chef's hats made it more enjoyable. The lemon sorbet had a fanned out wafer in it like when you were a kid.

It's not going to match other places for food but the experience was different and enjoyable. Like I said, there are regulars there and they're regular for a reason. It's a little gem of a place; we can't wait to take some visiting friends there for the experience.

2 of us x 3 courses + ?16 bottle of wine = ?46 + tip (it wasn't called a 'service charge' in the 80's) so no complaints there.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11796
Share on other sites

I dont get this snobby idea that you shouldnt eat somewhere because it may look a bit dated or need a lick of paint. That restaurant has been there many years for good reason, it offers superb customer service and the food is very good. Half of these places along LL have not been around for five minutes and probably wont be lucky enough to reach a stage where the paint on the outside is starting to peel.


I wonder sometimes if ED is turning into Islington heaven forbid.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11808
Share on other sites

If you've been a regular patron of Le Moulin over the many years, no doubt the frontage and interior are (in your own mind) as fresh as the day they were last updated (in 1973).

But it's not unreasonable for someone who doesn't know the place to think "if the owners don't care about what's on the outside, I don't think I'll take my chances with what's on the inside".

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11814
Share on other sites

Is it "snobby" to expect to be able to read the menu? And if you don't care about the grim state of the outside, why should I trust you to care about what goes on inside. Still, if they can make a living banging out early-bird trout and almond specials to the silver-surfers up from Penge, then good luck to them!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11820
Share on other sites

Jeremy if I am in the minority then so be it, it's obviously a successful minority if it's managing to keep Le Moulin in business after all these years. Perhaps the majority who take your view could offer Eric and Margaret some business advice if you believe you know how to run a restaurant better :)


Bob that is a good point, but usually word of mouth will spread and people will visit regardless, if the food is upto scratch.. the decor and peel of the paint add to the charm of this little place, which has stood the test of time unlike many along LL.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11822
Share on other sites

I've been kicking around ED since the mid-80s, and live 3 mins walk away from this place, but have never thought to go there. It just looks grubby and run down. If they are making money, fine, but the impression it gives is of a business on its last legs (though it's looked that way for some time).
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11828
Share on other sites

I believe the whole tone of this thread is a bit snobby to be honest rob. If we are going to point the finger at somewhere for bad service and awful food, why not pick a place like GBK or Caffe Nero.. Older people do still have taste buds, and we do recognise a good quality restaurant.. Le Moulin is everything you could want from a restaurant and it's good value. I know it's verging on the disgusting for some people to enter into a building which is showing it's age a little too much, but I can assure you that it's clean and the food is always fresh.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11829
Share on other sites

I was always put off by the condensation on their menu out the front too but we tried it and we liked it (the restaurant not the condensation). I guess there's some people on the forum who go there regularly and perhaps they could mention to Eric and Margaret that a bit of a spring clean outside would make the place more appealing. Sometimes people don't see the obvious when everyone else does and I think that a gentle and polite nudge in the right direction would do them the world of good.


[edited once]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11840
Share on other sites

I really don't see how this thread can be seen as snobbish! It's a fact of life that passing trade are unlikely to stop off at a restaurant with a shabby exterior. If we've never been to a restaurant and nobody has recommended it to us then all we have to judge it on is its appearance. Yes that may mean potentially missing out on a good meal and also spending money on bad meals at better looking restaurants, but if I'm going to take a chance on a new restaurant then I doubt it would be on one that looks grubby from the exterior as, has been mentioned above, it suggest grubbiness on the interior.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11842
Share on other sites

Of course there's always an exception to the rule.. that 'hidden gem' that serves up top-notch food behind a jaded exterior, but unfortunately, in London anyway, this is an exception.

In general, restaurants need all the help they can get - both to keep their existing customers and get new blood in through the door. Just on the basis of this thread, if it looked more appealing from the outside, they'd have at least four or five new customers immediately - at least to give it a go!


And without wishing to be rude (although no doubt I will be.. as usual) there is a difference between what youngER diners and what oldER diners consider to be 'good food'.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/526-le-moulin/#findComment-11844
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...