Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They didn,t used to be for grown ups they used to be for teenagers and early 20s, it's the whole grown up thing that has changed them. But despite my flaming I like the changes (Glastonbury early 90s again , no thanks) and they are great with kids - the family orientated ones anyway, wouldn't,t do a big one with mine

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They didn,t used to be for grown ups they used to

> be for teenagers and early 20s, it's the whole

> grown up thing that has changed them. But despite

> my flaming I like the changes (Glastonbury early

> 90s again , no thanks) and they are great with

> kids - the family orientated ones anyway,

> wouldn't,t do a big one with mine



Late teens/early 20's are grown-ups!

I meant there weren't loads of families with kids there. At least not when I went. If people had kids they left them at home with babysitters.

Colin Firth's D'arcy in Pride and prejudice. Sexy? NOOOOO.

Gravity (the film not the mysterious force that pulls two objects towards each other).

Baked beans.

Robin Williams RIP, only thing he did that I enjoyed was Mork and Mindy.

Champagne.

Wotsits and Monster Munch.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Park drive. Your list reads like it's from over a

> decade ago. I was making a joke



Oh right. So anything more than a decade old is off limits? I'll have to watch myself.

Off limits?


How do people leap to such assumptions?


I can comment about how stuck in the past you are without it being off limits no?


On the other hand if you are giving out about ten year old specifics...you hsvent exactly got your finger on the pulse


Or maybe you are actually Louisa

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Off limits?

>

> How do people leap to such assumptions?

>

> I can comment about how stuck in the past you are

> without it being off limits no?

>

> On the other hand if you are giving out about ten

> year old specifics...you hsvent exactly got your

> finger on the pulse

>

> Or maybe you are actually Louisa


So electronic gaming is a thing of the past as are PS4's etc? Maybe its you that doesn't have his finger on the pulse.

I find it funny how StraferJack still alludes to Parkdrive possibly being me.


On the topic of old people going to festivals I think it's incredibly cringe worthy when someone past a certain age engages in stuff aimed at younger people in a very awkward attempt to rekindle youth. Red face factor times 1000.


Louisa.

Christ above


I don't think park drive and Louisa are same person


I thought PD made a list of things which were not just slightly pass? but well out of date. And that's fine. That's ok. He is well entitled to do so


But in the interst of dialogue,humour,engagement I made a jolly play on how out of date the list was. No malice. Normally I would expect some "chuckles" back. But no. Dead eyed, humourless offence


But "out of order"??? Really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...