Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think canola oil is very similar to rapeseed oil - rapeseed oil being quite posh stuff that has been cold pressed. Contrary to what has been posted above I have always been told that canola/rapeseed it is much healthier than other oils (as Loz states) because it has the lowest saturated fat of any cooking oil... But, you know...I'm sure I've been told varying numbers of eggs I should eat in a week too, so everything in moderation.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > Canola Oil is pretty nasty..

>

> No it's not - it's actually pretty healthy... It does seem to be the subject of one of those fake email scares, though.


Result of an oft-misquoted line from the Godfather; "Leave the gun, bring the Canola."

Ok let's seperate food hygiene from the equation


If McDonald's sold a product that was at best 'misleading' then they'd be rightly pilloried


But Kebab shops which sells a non-lamb "Lamb Doner" is ok because the sell Shish when you're pissed


Ok, I see. But support that deception and then lash out at new business doing an honest job, because you don't like change/what they might stand for, is all fine and dandy


Tragic

My woman shunned the haggis on Saturday night as she said its full of offal. But she'll happily eat sausages or hot dogs which are all a lot worse in the mystery ingredients department.


As for Maccas I like a quarter pounder with cheese once or twice a year. But immediately after I get a weird high and feel unclean inside. A bit like the MSG buzz after a Mr Lius

The only time I've ever fancied a McDonalds as an adult has been when tottering down Shaftesbury Ave at three in the morning. Even then I've been shocked by the lack of any real texture - it's like eating baby food made into burger shapes.


Smarties McFlurries are good though.

Maybe I should have said that was a long time ago.


Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A sight worth seeing I would imagine!

>

>

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> tottering down Shaftesbury Ave

> at three in the morning.

phobic3000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I heard once that McDonalds milkshakes have

> sawdust in them... Urban myth?


Myth, though (if there was such a thing as food-grade sawdust) it might be healthier: the fibre would slow down the sugar absorption, making it lower GI and less stressful on the pancreas, and the displacement of sugar and fat by the sawdust would reduce the calories overall.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My woman shunned the haggis on Saturday night as

> she said its full of offal. But she'll happily eat

> sausages or hot dogs which are all a lot worse in

> the mystery ingredients department.


You want to do something about that - is it too late to chuck her in for a bandy legged Scots lass whose idea of fine dining is using a wooden fork with her chips?

Not Myth..


Saw Dust is formed into pulp 'Celulose' and used extensively in MANY everyday products..


Pepsi


Kellogg


Weight Watchers International


McDonald's




15 Food Companies That Serve You 'Wood'


http://www.thestreet.com/story/11012915/1/cellulose-wood-pulp-never-tasted-so-good.html?cm_ven=outbrain&psv=tscserps&obref=obnetwork




There may be more fibre in your food than you realized.


Burger King, McDonald?s and other fast food companies list in the ingredients of several of their foods,

microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) or ?powdered cellulose? as components of their menu items.

Or, in plain English, wood pulp.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-03/how-fast-food-providers-beat-inflation-add-wood-pulp-burgers

Miga


I too love a good Kebab


But a good Kebab is a rare thing, just don't see why the big guns like KFC & McD's get slated & the local shite mongers get blindsided



But in the world of dirty food, that KFC thing above does have a certain 'sexyness' to it

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Saw Dust is formed into pulp 'Celulose' and used extensively in MANY everyday products..


... and then processed further in to cellulose gum. But it's not saw dust then, is it? And possibly never was (wood pieces or chips, perhaps, but not dust).


Anyway, that's like shouting that Sainsburys use wood bark in their hot cross buns. Most of us call it 'cinnamon'. Or a restaurant puts tree sap on their pancakes (Maple syrup). Or tree leaves in their stews and casseroles (bay leaves).


You also find fish bladder or egg in your wine, boiled beetle shells in your soft drinks, cows stomachs in your cheese and horse's hooves in you fruit tart.


And most of those have been in our food for hundreds of years. Hardly the creation of the modern food industry!

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is called "Asian Takeaway". Google for peckham

> rye asian takeaway and you'll find it.

>

> They make the naan fresh, individually to order on

> the spot.

>

> There is a juice bar/stand/shack next door, who do

> some rather interesting concoctions.


nom


sometimes i wished i still ate meat,

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Canola oil IS Rapeseed oil



NO It's Not...


People often get confused about the difference between Canola Oil and Rapeseed Oil.

These two plant-based cooking oils, however, are different. Here?s the scoop on both.


Why They Get Mixed-Up: The Origin of Canola

Both canola and rapeseed belong to the cabbage or mustard family.

The plants' flowers both have that characteristic bright yellow colour, and you get oil from both of the seeds by crushing the plants.


That said, they have a couple key genetic differences. Canola was created through plant-breeding in order to get rid of two undesirable components of rapeseed.


Rapeseed oil and canola oil also get mixed up because they can be labeled incorrectly outside of Canada and the United States.


What's the Difference Between Canola and Rapeseed Oils?

In the 1970s canola was created through traditional plant cross-breeding by removing two things found in the rapeseed plant: glucosinolates and erucic acid. Erucic acid was removed because it was believed to be inedible or toxic in high doses. The newly developed plant was renamed "canola" ? a combination of "Canadian" and "Oil" (or ola) to make this difference apparent.


By definition, if a seed is labeled "canola" it has to have less than 30 micromoles of glucosinolates and less than 2% of erucic acid.


Source :- http://www.thekitchn.com/whats-the-difference-between-canola-and-rapeseed-206047


There is so much stuff out there on the subject.. Just have a read..


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...