Jump to content

ED tenants looking to get on the housing ladder in East London, would love some advice!


Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,


Myself and my girlfriend have been living in East Dulwich now for about 2 and a half years and have loved every minute. However, we've now come to a point where the landlord is selling up and its given us a kick to get ourselves on the ladder. As it happens due to our budget (around ?220k max) and 2 bed requirements we're looking to East London to hopefully discover the next ED in the making. To me Stratford seems like a great investment on paper, amazing rail links with imminent cross rail to be added as well as recent olympic regeneration and proximity to central. Now we both realise it ain't gonna be East Dulwich just yet but we're hoping one day in the next 5-6 years it may well be, however it is important that we survive unscathed in the meantime ;)


Would love some of your advise on Stratford and the nearby areas (West ham, plaistow, upton park etc) and also some sensible critique of my logic please. Would like to know we've considered it all before making the plunge in 4-6 months time.


Thanks in advance for your help!


Matt

Stratford is never going to be an East Dulwich because it's a major transport hub and shopping centre so a very different place, but probably the best of the ones you mention. Of the others, I'd probably go for Plaistow as there's a couple of decent pubs and a bit more community/villagey feel but without being too negative they are all a lot different to anything in SE22...a lot!

What quids and uncleglen said.


It's affordable and one day, one day, you might see green shoots of what you like in dulwich appear


When I realised I couldn't buy in dulwich, I didn't look east despite 3 years in e6/e12


But someone will gamble there someday and win

I'd go for Wanstead rather than Stratford. Nice high St, green space and I don't think it had the massive price rises that happened in Stratford pre- Olypics. So it may give you a better return although I doubt your budget would be enough for 2 beds (similarly in Stratford). Having said that I think you would get much more for your money in South London. I moved from the east end about five years ago. The sale of my ex council flat funded the move, there is no way I could have afforded an equivalent house (or indeed any house) in the area I left but I could afford one in ED. Similarly for several friends. Have you considered moving further south - Catford/Penge/Sydenham?

Catford and Penge have crossed our minds actually, will have to look further into those areas. Will also check out Wanstead and Abbey Wood, we're looking to get on the ladder but also make a good investment in an area which is likely to appreciate, all the while being somewhere we may even enjoy living for the next 5-6 years... Probsbly too much to ask isn't it?!


Thanks for the advice and discussion everyone, very useful and enlightening!


Matt

Tbh you are going to struggle in those areas looking for a 2 bed on your budget, your choice may be limited. If you are hoping for an area on the up, look for good housing stock( even if much is not in good nick), decent and improving transport links, at least one pub/deli/shop that wouldnt look out of place in ed. Stratford is all very new build. The olympic park is amazing, and hackney wick has a vibrant arts scene, but housing stock not great. You will struggle on your budget in wanstead, plaistow more likely. Imo west ham has a long way to go. Really scruffy high street and you will be very dependent on the tube.


Good luck!

Penge has really changed a lot in the last three or four years and feels like a place fast changing for the better.


Some great pubs (one's owned by Antic) with another to hopefully come soon (run by Late Knights), a theatre, the brilliant Alexandra Nurseries (cafe/plant/vintage place), cafes incl a Blue Mountain, a great butcher's, fishmongers, a med food store (PFC), guitar shop, loads of practical shops (Boots, Superdrug, Wilkinsons, Sainsburys, Lidl, Homebase, etc).


Plus the stuff that was always there, such as hundreds of Victorian houses and some nice parks, including of course, Crystal Palace park and brill transport links (18 mins to Victoria, Overground to Shoreditch, etc)


Additionally a good social scene is spawning from Penge Tourist Board facebook group members, with a Film Club starting soon, good local art scene, open mic nights and a steadily increasing number of music gigs that suggest that could take off too.


Check out http://pengetouristboard.co.uk/

If there's an area close-ish to ED which has potential to boom, then Penge is it.


Much of East London is super-grim, and though the Hams, Forest Gate, etc look cheap, it's for a reason. They might get better, but I wouldn't personally want to take such a big risk.


Stratford and Wanstead are both fairly popular now so you might struggle with your budget. And for me... Stratford feels a bit soulless, and Wanstead feels too suburban/Essex.

Wish people would stay out of Catford! Rents and prices already shooting up there creating a huge amount of homelessness as landlords evict their long standing tenants or raise their rents way above what is affordable in the hope of catching the newer money spilling in from already overpriced areas. My fear is in three or four years time Catford will be as socially cleansed as other areas.

It's all in the original posters'a comments isn't it


People don't just move to an area they can afford - they move and actively want prices to continue to go up after they move thus preventing others from doing what they did

Bovine Juice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sourdough is coming soon hopefully... ;) A

> bakers/tea shop is opening in the old teddy bear

> emporium.


It's a horrendous situation (no sourdough) so I for one am keeping clear of the area until this is rectified.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People don't just move to an area they can afford

> - they move and actively want prices to continue

> to go up after they move thus preventing others

> from doing what they did


It does sound distasteful when you put it like that, but realistically it's just about finding the best (in the long run) area you can afford for your budget. I don't think anyone can be blamed for that.

But there is a Greggs & another bakery right next door


So y'know - sourgh dough or not, wheat-based snacks rule in Penge


I'd head Beckenham way if I had too


Don't even try Sydenham, we don't like strangers in these 'ere parts

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> landlords evict their

> long standing tenants or raise their rents way

> above what is affordable in the hope of catching

> the newer money spilling in from already

> overpriced areas.


A bit like... ooo... everywhere else.

Quids you are detecting nothing but windmills - you are in contrary form lately even by your standards


Nowhere am I giving out about people moving. Absolutely nowhere


What I do have s problem with is people wanting property prices to rise when they move there

Jeremy. As I say absolutely nothing wrong with people moving anywhere.


But the dynamic of wanting prices to rise (or looking after yourself in long run or whatever phrase we use ) is the key reason more houses aren't being built. People keep saying "supply and demand. Build houses and the prices will come down". But too many people do not want prices to come down

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...