Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you're not interested don't comment? Nice and

> simple. Some people.

>

> Louisa.


This is what I struggle with.....if you're not interested in their check ins don't look, or start a thread about it.....


I'm an unashamed user of check ins. I can see your point that it's a bit w***y but why on earth did you get THAT angry.....

I also supsect that Louisa is just an internet character. Not a real person at all. Too many contradictions in writing style. Louisa I think is probably a middle aged bloke in reality, trying to be a comedian but not consistant enough to fool anybody.

That's right Blah, I'm a bawding 47 year old man named John who lives in A one bed flat in Romford. The game is up! Bugger.


I better grab my coat.


Albert I may have overlooked the poor spelling of one word, but two is unforgivable. "Suspect". Merci.


Louisa.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but not consistant enough to fool anybody.



This is a joke yes?


Lou has been fooling people and getting a rise out of people for 8 years (her forum birthday is this week). Yes it may get old when you've been around a while but I still take pleasure in seeing people respond to her.


Long live Lou.

Otta it's my forum birthday? I'm so excited!! Can everyone chip in on a bottle of blue nun for me and leave it with the security guard at Iceland? (He knows me personally). I'll pick it up when I pop by sometime this week!


Louisa.

Louisa, a forum birthday is brill but a landmark real birthday (50th, 60th, 70th) would be an amazing cause for a celebration. We could all get together and let our hair (what's left of it) down.


Might have to wait a while for my invite but will be worth it :)

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta I think one of my first pre-registration

> posts was an altercation with Keef over North

> Cross RD market!

>

> Louisa.


He was a right tosser, I'm glad be moved on.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta I think one of my first pre-registration

> > posts was an altercation with Keef over North

> > Cross RD market!

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> He was a right tosser, I'm glad be moved on.




Damn it, Mick Mack got in before me. Yep, Keef was a cunt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...