Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have just received an email from Southwark Council which included a link to "help work out what benefits you are entitled to."


I have to say it is fascinating and if you change your circumstances from "Property Owner" with no job to "Renting from a private Landlord" with no job, the differences in what you can claim are amazing.


As a private owner you are entitled to ?0 in housing benefit, yet the same person renting somewhere (say ?1000 a month) can get upto ?270 in housing benefits a week.


Surely both circumstances need money to keep a roof over their heads, a bit unfair don't you think.


anyway if you need help then go to Sponge Calculator to see what you can or can not claim.


I am interested in peoples views on the issue of Housing Benefit if you rent vs. nothing if you own.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5530-benefits-calculator/
Share on other sites

No Gordon is making sure homeowners are helped if they lose their job...so he trumpeted back in the autumn....this is, of course the reality, there's only one person he's trying to keep in his home and that's himself in Number 10...


he's a shambolic imbecile on the bridge of a sinking ship.....we need someone with vision and boldness...and I can't see who that is, but it sure isn't him

It's right that the government should pay rent for unemployed people so that they don't wind up homeless. I see no reason why the State should help someone buy their home by paying their mortgage. If somebody's really desperate they need to sell their home, rent privately and then duly claim housing benefit.
I can understand the logic of Government money not being used to pay off the capital on an unemployed person's mortgage, but what if it was switched to interest-only for the unemployed period? If it's interest-only then the Government isn't helping anyone to accrue wealth, merely keeping a roof over people's heads. I confess I've never given it much thought and would be interested to know what others think (just so long as the thread doesn't go all Daily Mail - yawn).

It is quite an interesting question. Which is worse, using public money to pay for people?s mortgages ultimately enriching the banks, or making people give up their homes and rent privately thereby putting more homes on the market which will be snapped up by private landlords ultimately resulting in more property in the hands of fewer people?


If I look at the face of it I have to say I have an issue with benefit money ultimately ending up in the pockets of private landlords or the banks.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is quite an interesting question. Which is

> worse, using public money to pay for people?s

> mortgages ultimately enriching the banks, or

> making people give up their homes and rent

> privately thereby putting more homes on the market

> which will be snapped up by private landlords

> ultimately resulting in more property in the hands

> of fewer people?

>

> If I look at the face of it I have to say I have

> an issue with benefit money ultimately ending up

> in the pockets of private landlords or the banks.




So more council housing then?

Don?t know. I don?t have any opinions or answers, just trying to unpack the question properly.


Where would more council housing come from? Councils buying up repossessed properties? That would probably be too expensive. The government appropriating properties from the banks or private individuals? All sounds a bit ?Zimbabwe?.


A long term strategy of proper regulation in the housing market may work. Now if only we had a government who we employed to run the country because that is the sort of thing we could rely on them to do, surely.


Anyway hopefully not too many people will lose their jobs and consequently their homes and it won?t be a problem. Well any more of a problem than it already is.

At the moment benefits are going to McDonalds, KFC and the cigarette companies. What's new?


MrRose claimed unemployment benefit recently. As taxpayers we are taxed separately (I am self employed), but when claiming he was assessed as part of a couple, and even though I earn less than ?10,000 a year, and he was out of work, guess what - he only only entitled to ?60 and no council tax benefit either. We don't have a mortgage and don't pay rent.


What's even more frustrating, Peckham's JobCentrePlus gave NO help or advice regarding retraining and new NOTHING about all the schemes and plans and extra help and retraining that the government keeps telling everyone is happening now. Peckham JobCentrePlus is utterly useless.


Fortunately, quite a few of you kind lot are employing him at the moment and so we hope this will continue till he gets another job because he signed off since there was absolutely no point in signing on.

"What's even more frustrating, Peckham's JobCentrePlus gave NO help or advice regarding retraining and new NOTHING about all the schemes and plans and extra help and retraining that the government keeps telling everyone is happening now. Peckham JobCentrePlus is utterly useless. "


Nope it's not the jobcentre that's uselees it's the governemnt that is...these schemes don't exist (see also support for mortgages and freed up lending for small businesses), this governemnt is useless, shambolic, and corrupt. They have made a lot of noise about what they are doing and apart from giving away ?10bn on a useless 2.5% cut in VAT they've done SFA...but it all sounds great and dynamic in mr "I feel your pain' Brown's media appearances....or slimey, corrupt ?1m pension pot from the EC, Mandleson's pronouncements...bring on the revolution get rid of these leeches

I went to the CAB in Peckham after 6 months without a job and was told that because I have no children and am not pregnant I am not applicable for any kind of help whatsoever. Apparently 25 years of paying taxes is irrelevant. Luckily I am in a contract role at the moment and saving desperately but do feel that there is no safety net for many.
I was on the Southwark Waiting List from 1973 until I bought my own place in 1983...better check as I might still be on the list...kept getting pushed further and further down the list....:-S....why couldn't I have been born in Borneo or Andorra or Liechenstein..I've have been housed within around 7 minutes/weeks/months by Southwark....still maybe in the next lifetime..(tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...