Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My secret, exposed. I was the only boy in a family of six sisters, all of whose wages at the match factory were tithed by my parents so I could attend the school.


It was a matter of no little heartbreak to me that the other children would not accept me (turning up on my first day in hand-me-down smock and my hair in bunches didn't help), and Mr Crossbeam would never cast me in the school plays, which were of course performed in world class theatrical spaces.


I twitch to the sound of Maria from West Side Story to this day.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

My secret, exposed. It was a matter of no little heartbreak to me that the other children would not accept me (turning up

on my first day in hand-me-down smock and my hair in bunches didn't help), and Mr Crossbeam would never cast me in the school plays, which were of course performed in world class theatrical spaces.


I bet you played a fair "Peaseblossom" though TM.....tls exeunt...

Obviously this thread is a joke. I don't understand why you are considering sending ANY of your kids to public school since clearly it's outside of your socio-economic capabilities. I went to public school but then so did my sister and brothers as well as my mother and father and grandparents in their day. I think it would have been extremely weird if just one of us had been singled out to attend public school while the others went to state school. Why not invest your money in a plasma TV and get all of your kids into reasonable comprehensives?

dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Obviously this thread is a joke. I don't

> understand why you are considering sending ANY of

> your kids to public school since clearly it's

> outside of your socio-economic capabilities. I

> went to public school but then so did my sister

> and brothers as well as my mother and father and

> grandparents in their day. I think it would have

> been extremely weird if just one of us had been

> singled out to attend public school while the

> others went to state school. Why not invest your

> money in a plasma TV and get all of your kids into

> reasonable comprehensives?



- DD -an interesting post by you . i have 2 sisters and 2 brothers. 1 of each went to private schools and 1 of each did not. On the grounds of cost vs academic ability. A bit weird maybe, but rather some than go than none? You assume that if you canpay 15 grand a year for 1 kid, you can also pay 60 grand a year for 4. unrealistic.

dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Obviously this thread is a joke. I don't

> understand why you are considering sending ANY of

> your kids to public school since clearly it's

> outside of your socio-economic capabilities. I

> went to public school but then so did my sister

> and brothers as well as my mother and father and

> grandparents in their day. I think it would have

> been extremely weird if just one of us had been

> singled out to attend public school while the

> others went to state school. Why not invest your

> money in a plasma TV and get all of your kids into

> reasonable comprehensives?



what a snidey shithole of a sneering comment. take your dreadloicks and fuck off back to whatever you came from

Solution.


1. Send all the kids to the nearest comprehensive. It will be good for them. Sink or swim.


2. Calculate how much it would have cost you to send one of them to the fee-paying school, per month.


3. Once per month, spend that amount of money on you and your partner in an activity not involving the kids. Weekends away, massages, 5 star grub etc., etc.


4. Show the kids photos reflecting how glorious was your experience. Tell them if them if they work hard at school they will be able to enjoy similar experiences when they are older.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Today we are seeing the impact of increased taxes (employers NI) with tje UK unemployment rate rising  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxrp7znkdlo Unfortunately, to increase tax burdens will see the economy stall or a recession, as Angelina says, cutting spending, whilst painful short term, is a good way to bring down government borrowing.  True, we don't want to see cuts to services but there are other areas of government spending that can be reduced and with AI impacting all jobs across all businesses, maybe it will also reduce overall staffing costs. 
    • or cut costs.  The cost of debt is a huge burden, it cannot be increased.
    • Yes, they should clearly have been more honest on taxes before the election and not backed themselves into a corner. After 14 years of mismanagement and decline, they have to invest and at the same time start to bring borrowing down (otherwise they continues to be at the mercy of the bond markets). Continued cuts / degrading of public services is counter productive (a successful economy and society needs good infrastructure, education and health care).  The single biggest thing they could do to immediately improve growth would be to rejoin the single market, but I appreciate that is difficult politically.  So if you can't significantly boost growth short term, can't cut too much further, and need to raise money without borrowing, that only really leaves taxation.    Of course, where best to target those taxes - that's the real question.
    • Need moving boxes for house move - all sizes / shapes and bubble wrap too if available. Can collect asap. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...