Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My secret, exposed. I was the only boy in a family of six sisters, all of whose wages at the match factory were tithed by my parents so I could attend the school.


It was a matter of no little heartbreak to me that the other children would not accept me (turning up on my first day in hand-me-down smock and my hair in bunches didn't help), and Mr Crossbeam would never cast me in the school plays, which were of course performed in world class theatrical spaces.


I twitch to the sound of Maria from West Side Story to this day.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

My secret, exposed. It was a matter of no little heartbreak to me that the other children would not accept me (turning up

on my first day in hand-me-down smock and my hair in bunches didn't help), and Mr Crossbeam would never cast me in the school plays, which were of course performed in world class theatrical spaces.


I bet you played a fair "Peaseblossom" though TM.....tls exeunt...

Obviously this thread is a joke. I don't understand why you are considering sending ANY of your kids to public school since clearly it's outside of your socio-economic capabilities. I went to public school but then so did my sister and brothers as well as my mother and father and grandparents in their day. I think it would have been extremely weird if just one of us had been singled out to attend public school while the others went to state school. Why not invest your money in a plasma TV and get all of your kids into reasonable comprehensives?

dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Obviously this thread is a joke. I don't

> understand why you are considering sending ANY of

> your kids to public school since clearly it's

> outside of your socio-economic capabilities. I

> went to public school but then so did my sister

> and brothers as well as my mother and father and

> grandparents in their day. I think it would have

> been extremely weird if just one of us had been

> singled out to attend public school while the

> others went to state school. Why not invest your

> money in a plasma TV and get all of your kids into

> reasonable comprehensives?



- DD -an interesting post by you . i have 2 sisters and 2 brothers. 1 of each went to private schools and 1 of each did not. On the grounds of cost vs academic ability. A bit weird maybe, but rather some than go than none? You assume that if you canpay 15 grand a year for 1 kid, you can also pay 60 grand a year for 4. unrealistic.

dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Obviously this thread is a joke. I don't

> understand why you are considering sending ANY of

> your kids to public school since clearly it's

> outside of your socio-economic capabilities. I

> went to public school but then so did my sister

> and brothers as well as my mother and father and

> grandparents in their day. I think it would have

> been extremely weird if just one of us had been

> singled out to attend public school while the

> others went to state school. Why not invest your

> money in a plasma TV and get all of your kids into

> reasonable comprehensives?



what a snidey shithole of a sneering comment. take your dreadloicks and fuck off back to whatever you came from

Solution.


1. Send all the kids to the nearest comprehensive. It will be good for them. Sink or swim.


2. Calculate how much it would have cost you to send one of them to the fee-paying school, per month.


3. Once per month, spend that amount of money on you and your partner in an activity not involving the kids. Weekends away, massages, 5 star grub etc., etc.


4. Show the kids photos reflecting how glorious was your experience. Tell them if them if they work hard at school they will be able to enjoy similar experiences when they are older.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The BBC is one of the finest, if not the finest, broadcasters in the world.  They have been admired by many across the world for their journalism.  There have been numerous arrests since their recent expose on convenience shops that cover ups for criminals - money laundering, contraband,  illegal workers and the like. By no means perfect and some of what they have done in the modern world is questionable - the website often comes across as tabloid or sensationalist, as do some of their documentaries, and at times it is full of low grade game shows, fly on the wall etc which bring the punters and money, including overseas, in but is not quality TV.  In their desperation for 'balance' they've given too much air time and credibility to some more extreme views, which contributed to Brexit and some of the rise in right wing parties.  I wish they'd say 'the convicted criminal' every time they talk about Yaxley Lenon. The programme was clumsy, why it didn't go through proper clearance including the lawyers, I don't know.  But it created zero stir at the time. Zero.  And had no impact on the election, so Trump has no case.  I hope they don't cave in like many of the US corporations and media.  Oh and well done to South Park using the small p*nis defence in ridiculing him. What I expect is as the Beeb is pretty centrist in it;s reporting in riles some of those who thrive on the toxic populism we have seen since Trump mark 1 and Brexit.  How sad.
    • I understand from Pao that they are taking a short break but will be re-opening on Tuesday 25th November and also that there will be a sign in the window tomorrow, by way of confirmation. Meanwhile, greatly  missed! 
    • He is bummed he missed last forum drinks 
    • They get one thing running and another goes down!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...