Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recorded today. Loathsome Dave.

>

> https://soundcloud.com/the_e_r_c/loathsome-dave-eccentronic-research-council-ft-maxine-peake


Good lord - it's like a recording from an post-pub Occupy meeting. Close your eyes and you can almost see them all sitting around making jazz hands at the end.

And with genuine reason.


I have spent the last 3 years in a job which was basically designed to implement the Coalition cuts in my local authority. We've cut down to the bone, whilst TRYING to still help people as much as possible. And now it's going to get worse (we've already been warned) and there isn't much left to cut away. My colleague is desperately looking for another job, and I am desperately hoping she finds one so that I might be more secure because I can't see us both surviving.


So yeah, I vent my spleen a bit on facebook when I see stupid dicks who work in the NHS and vive in the burbs going on about benefits cheats and immigrants. These people are stupid as far as I'm concerned.


But if you're not at any real risk and it gives you a good giggle then great. I find that a little bit twisted though quite frankly.

Well if you're talking about particular insensitive twats then go for it but I'm talking about the whole if you don't agree with me you're a thick cunt type comments. In actual fact I wasn't referring to you as in the interest of our friendship I unfollowed you for a while! I really hope you don't lose your job, but that goes without saying x

I don't THINK I've actually called anyone thick or anything (I might have but don't think so).


I've more just said how depressing I find it and how scary. My Mrs make a turkeys voting for Christmas comment but she works in the NHS and I think that was directed at people in her work place (and I think that's fair).

Have a read of mine, I just checked and I can't see anything that could cause offence except someone else's status which I shared.


I've mainly talked about where it went wrong for Labour rather than slagging anyone off.


The wife will say what she wants to say, and she'll stand by it, and it will be a cold day in hell before she changes her mind about the Tories.


When people vote based on blatant lies they are fed by the daily mail or the sun, then I don't think it's entirely unfair to question their intelligence (and yes same for those who believe everything they read in the Guardian).

I've been watching back over the night and more especially at the opinions spouted by the Labour elite. They seem to have spent most of the campaign looking in on themselves positively whilst dismissing the bigger picture. In other words, the urban intelligentsia are on a different planet to the rest of us. A very 'London Labour' view of the UK, totally out of line with the larger view. This has to be addressed over this coming parliament.


Two important points, firstly, a divided union. Scotland doesn't believe Labour (or Westminster in general) gives them a voice. For many Scots, the translation of this at the ballot box has been to vote SNP. Whether they believe Scotland should be independent or not. The Labour and left leaning Scottish electorate, rightly or wrongly, assume the SNP to be left of Labour. They are not in my opinion, but Sturgeon has run a wonderful and convincing campaign which has supported this assumption.


Secondly, in England (and to a lesser extent Wales), the traditional Labour voter outside of London is feeling quite a bit isolated. Across the heartlands a significant enough number is turning to UKIP primarily over fears about immigration and other working class issues that they feel the wealthy Labour elite is failing to recognise or be trusted on, and this is enough to push UKIP into runner up. In the marginals, the centre-left leaning voters are believing Labour will damage the economy and are too far to the left, and so are going over to or staying with the tories as a result.


The consequences of all of this are that Labour are seen as too far to the right in Scotland, and too far to the left in England. Labour now has to confront the rise of tribalism as a consequence of the swings on the political spectrum and the makeup of the new parliament. It will be a difficult job for the new leader.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...