Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This thread is just hilarious.


Hugo got DD down to a T and she's been shown to be an attention seeking nutter - but she just keeps ignoring anything that points to her blatant chracter flaws and screams bully!


How far do you think she will drag this?


I reckon she'll get to 20 pages of woe is me and paranoia.


Place your bets guys.

Quite right DD. It automatically becomes bullying if more than one person disagrees with you.


So far as I'm concerned you're an example to us all.


With your unblemished record I'm surprised that anyone would have had the gall to respond as if the sauce for the gander was fit for the goose.


It strikes me that Matt, Miles, Dulwichmum and Archic may well have known each other and actually planned this entrapment before a visit to the forum was even a twinkle in your eye. Like an evil gang they plotted a series of encounters guaranteed to expose the best side of you, in order to prove any subsequent criticism all the more unfounded.


Our four playground chumpsters, with their schoolboy teasing CANNOT be working alone, such is the strength and accuracy of their attack.


It wouldn't surprise me if the whole gang had even invented the forum just to lay a trap for you.


You may think that 2,000 subscribers is too many for such a conspiracy, but such is the power of the internet that it could have been achieved without blinking an eye.


They must all, without fail, be unutterably evil, with tainted hearts and jealous hate focused on you as if the inner circle of the ED Forum was indeed the Senate and you our faultless Caesar, more sinned against than sinning.


And finally, like Roman senators they stand indifferent to your slaughter. If Matt is your Casca, then beware Daizie your Brutus, such is the depth of this conspiracy.


I have never seen anyone persecuted in our modern age to the extent that you have suffered. Fight it, fight it, dear heart.


;-)


Edited not very well for mixed metaphors

Absolutely they have exposed themselves. Good job I'm on your side DD.


Occam's razor suggests that all things being equal, the simplest solution is the most likely one.


In this situation it's clear that the simplest explanation is a massive conspiracy between thousands of people who don't know either you or each other, to plot the extended downfall of a faultless victim of unblemished reputation guilty of nothing but a generous spirit.


The simplest explanation when these conspirators appear to disagree with each other is that they're putting it on, in order to give the impression that they have perfectly healthy relationships, when in fact it's all about ganging up on you!


It's a good job we know the science eh DD?

DD you're no victim, of course!


Joan of Arc, Emmeline Pankhurst, Mary Magdalene: these are victims.


You are Athena, mighty daughter of Zeus and Metis, striding the world with your endeavour, subject to no establishment!


Whilst these mortals quake, I hide behind your skirts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...