Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeeeez, East Dulwich is now known as "Nappy Valley" - according to the owners of the EDT http://www.antic-ltd.com/edt/index.html


Whilst it was only recently I was coming to terms with it being called "Duppytown" - http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,142680,230235


What next!?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5881-nappy-valley-or-duppytown/
Share on other sites

In certain circles it has been "Nappy Valley" for a long time...although the term originally regerred to Clapham it has slowly spread ino ED. South East London has the highest density of children per head of population across Europe apparently...hence my bizarre profession/job title.

The Nappy Lady Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In certain circles it has been "Nappy Valley" for

> a long time...although the term originally

> regerred to Clapham it has slowly spread ino ED.

> South East London has the highest density of

> children per head of population across Europe

> apparently...hence my bizarre profession/job

> title.


As an active, card-carrying child-hater, this is terrible news.

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > As an active, card-carrying child-hater, this

> is

> > terrible news.

> >

> > Why so lenk?

>

> Why is it terrible news or why are you an active

> card-carrying child-hater?


the post about "South East London has the highest density of children per head of population across Europe "


Surely there's villages in the Home Counties for things like bringing kids up?

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I may be a scrooge but to pay over £100 plus for a meal is a bit much. I understand that staff costs would be a high factor in this price and that being no transport on Christmas Day - pubs may have to pay car hire fees. The café in Christ Church will be doing a 3 course meal in the run up to Christmas for around £30 per head (Booking essential) so to charge an additional £60 plus seems somewhat unreasonable. The past few years, there have only been the 2 of us on Christmas Day, so we lash out and buy a lot of M & S food - ready prepared or with minimal cooking at a cost of between £30 and £40. We host the family Boxing Day onwards (8 - 10 people) spending around £60 on food and drink. Rather spend £100 for food etc over a couple of days rather than £200 for one meal. We are fortunate that we have the finances  to do this as many people are not able to do this. One family member with young children would find it hard to spend even £10 on a Christmas meal. Our kids come armed with plastic boxes to all family meals to take home any leftovers - so we are left with minimal waste- any veg and meat  get made into soup.
    • That would be Dulwich Wood ward wouldn’t it? One of the wards Southwark added Nov ‘23. Maybe the estate against didn’t get the memo. Oh man what a shit show. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...