Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a sentence where the context demanded that I use 'to'!


What next? I fear that it's but a short step to starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're' inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and 'lose'.


signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)


:(

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6025-i-think-im-losing-it/
Share on other sites

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a

> sentence where the context demanded that I use

> 'to'!

>

> What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and

> 'lose'.

>

> signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)

>

> :(


Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush say.

Let it never happen again, this is after all East Dulwich not bastard Romford.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


Huguenot. Dilemma. Huge horns. Did I find myself on them? Did I hell. I launched myself onto them.

Cease the entanglement with the over-refined I beg you and be philosophical on the matter. I know I will be.

Their but for the grace of God go I.

Kells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

>

> > Let it never happen again, this is after all

> East

> > Dulwich not bastard Romford.

>

> Don't you knock Romford. I should of stayed there

> :-p


And you could of, if things'd of worked out differently.

It's just where life takes us of course.

And there's HB in all sorts of hot water:


"you could of, if things'd of worked out differently"


It shouldn't be 'of' of course, but 'have', or an artfuly placed apostrophe to denote missing letters and generate 'could've'.


As in "I have done something in my trousers" or "I could have done something in my trousers" or "I could've made a message there..."

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sherwick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in

> a

> > sentence where the context demanded that I use

> > 'to'!

> >

> > What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> > starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> > inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose'

> and

> > 'lose'.

> >

> > signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka

> Sherwick)

> >

> > :(

>

> Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of

> yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush

> say.

> Let it never happen again, this is after all East

> Dulwich not bastard Romford.


:(

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


That would not be a conditional.


And I think what you are looking for would be something like "I was used to doing something, and then..."

PGC - I'm afraid I disagree with your marking, is there an appeal committee?


Huguenot - half of me is covered in shame and simpering apologetically, and the other half is thinking 'the lying get'. That said, I usually use the irony to take wrinkles out of my clothes, so am not to be considered an authority.


Sherwick, see me after class. Bring your stockholder certificates and a copy of the AGM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What is your beef with me ? Why are you asking rhetorical questions?  fighting me but excusing reform? have a look in the mirror  you’ve lost your way 
    • I don't need you to tell me to 'fight against' racism.  I know what it looks it like, thank you.  And China would be our enemy whether we were in Europe or not (and has been for a long time), so that's immaterial.  I remember covering an EDL march 12 years ago, when there was a Cons-Lib Dem coalition, so the idea that this is a new problem is rubbish. BUT Reform is doing an excellent job of galvanising a minority in reaction to smug liberals like you, who blame the electorate's collective ignorance for all the country's demons.  What right have you for a moral mandate? 
    • Both Labour and Conservatives can remove the threat of a Reform government by making making two major policy promises. And these are .......... (1) categorically state that they will take Britain out of the ECHR and (2) Undertake to remove any new small boat arrivals to Rwanda or wherever else. Reform is basically a single issue party and adopting (1) & (2) would send Reform into obscurity. The country has had enough of our judiciary making a gold-plated interpretation of the ECHR statutes.  
    • You fight against by not pretending. By calling it what it is. Instead of slyly pretending they are not racist “actually”  recognise what the country is facing and say “no” why do you even need to ask the question?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...