Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a sentence where the context demanded that I use 'to'!


What next? I fear that it's but a short step to starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're' inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and 'lose'.


signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)


:(

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6025-i-think-im-losing-it/
Share on other sites

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a

> sentence where the context demanded that I use

> 'to'!

>

> What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and

> 'lose'.

>

> signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)

>

> :(


Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush say.

Let it never happen again, this is after all East Dulwich not bastard Romford.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


Huguenot. Dilemma. Huge horns. Did I find myself on them? Did I hell. I launched myself onto them.

Cease the entanglement with the over-refined I beg you and be philosophical on the matter. I know I will be.

Their but for the grace of God go I.

Kells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

>

> > Let it never happen again, this is after all

> East

> > Dulwich not bastard Romford.

>

> Don't you knock Romford. I should of stayed there

> :-p


And you could of, if things'd of worked out differently.

It's just where life takes us of course.

And there's HB in all sorts of hot water:


"you could of, if things'd of worked out differently"


It shouldn't be 'of' of course, but 'have', or an artfuly placed apostrophe to denote missing letters and generate 'could've'.


As in "I have done something in my trousers" or "I could have done something in my trousers" or "I could've made a message there..."

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sherwick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in

> a

> > sentence where the context demanded that I use

> > 'to'!

> >

> > What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> > starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> > inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose'

> and

> > 'lose'.

> >

> > signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka

> Sherwick)

> >

> > :(

>

> Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of

> yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush

> say.

> Let it never happen again, this is after all East

> Dulwich not bastard Romford.


:(

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


That would not be a conditional.


And I think what you are looking for would be something like "I was used to doing something, and then..."

PGC - I'm afraid I disagree with your marking, is there an appeal committee?


Huguenot - half of me is covered in shame and simpering apologetically, and the other half is thinking 'the lying get'. That said, I usually use the irony to take wrinkles out of my clothes, so am not to be considered an authority.


Sherwick, see me after class. Bring your stockholder certificates and a copy of the AGM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...