Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a sentence where the context demanded that I use 'to'!


What next? I fear that it's but a short step to starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're' inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and 'lose'.


signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)


:(

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6025-i-think-im-losing-it/
Share on other sites

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a

> sentence where the context demanded that I use

> 'to'!

>

> What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and

> 'lose'.

>

> signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)

>

> :(


Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush say.

Let it never happen again, this is after all East Dulwich not bastard Romford.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


Huguenot. Dilemma. Huge horns. Did I find myself on them? Did I hell. I launched myself onto them.

Cease the entanglement with the over-refined I beg you and be philosophical on the matter. I know I will be.

Their but for the grace of God go I.

Kells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

>

> > Let it never happen again, this is after all

> East

> > Dulwich not bastard Romford.

>

> Don't you knock Romford. I should of stayed there

> :-p


And you could of, if things'd of worked out differently.

It's just where life takes us of course.

And there's HB in all sorts of hot water:


"you could of, if things'd of worked out differently"


It shouldn't be 'of' of course, but 'have', or an artfuly placed apostrophe to denote missing letters and generate 'could've'.


As in "I have done something in my trousers" or "I could have done something in my trousers" or "I could've made a message there..."

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sherwick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in

> a

> > sentence where the context demanded that I use

> > 'to'!

> >

> > What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> > starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> > inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose'

> and

> > 'lose'.

> >

> > signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka

> Sherwick)

> >

> > :(

>

> Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of

> yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush

> say.

> Let it never happen again, this is after all East

> Dulwich not bastard Romford.


:(

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


That would not be a conditional.


And I think what you are looking for would be something like "I was used to doing something, and then..."

PGC - I'm afraid I disagree with your marking, is there an appeal committee?


Huguenot - half of me is covered in shame and simpering apologetically, and the other half is thinking 'the lying get'. That said, I usually use the irony to take wrinkles out of my clothes, so am not to be considered an authority.


Sherwick, see me after class. Bring your stockholder certificates and a copy of the AGM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disagree. Where are the police when you need them? People want a police presence, they want to feel reassured by seeing them do what the word suggests, policing, so go catch some bad guys, arrest, charge and get the CPS to prosecute with the evidence to enable this to happen. Stabbing and shootings are so common place they no longer even get reported in the public domain. How many crimes don't get solved? Rather case closed and forgotten. The number of low to high level crimes which remain unsolved is staggering.  The criminal fraternity know this, they know they won't get caught so they just carry on.  Biggest crimes which affect most people, probably are phone and car theft, both are prolific and what do the police do, diddly squat. zilch, nothing, provide a crime reference number and the case is closed. Not good enough, not by a country mile.   Met Engage? I don't think so.
    • https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/violent-crime-plunges-london-homicide-rate-b1247078.html Worth doing a little checking before making assumptions about violent crimes. Recent data suggests a drop in violent crime. Gang violence will make a significant contribution to the numbers. You are unlikely to be attacked by a stranger   
    • Unfortunately there are plenty of shops which don't care and will sell vapes, alcohol and weed to minors, I'm sure they won't care about selling them fireworks. Or the kids nick them.
    • It’s getting a bit annoying. We’ve a nervous dog who trembles when they go off. I know to expect it around Halloween and Diwali but it seems to be happening more through the year. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...