Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a sentence where the context demanded that I use 'to'!


What next? I fear that it's but a short step to starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're' inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and 'lose'.


signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)


:(

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6025-i-think-im-losing-it/
Share on other sites

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in a

> sentence where the context demanded that I use

> 'to'!

>

> What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose' and

> 'lose'.

>

> signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka Sherwick)

>

> :(


Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush say.

Let it never happen again, this is after all East Dulwich not bastard Romford.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


Huguenot. Dilemma. Huge horns. Did I find myself on them? Did I hell. I launched myself onto them.

Cease the entanglement with the over-refined I beg you and be philosophical on the matter. I know I will be.

Their but for the grace of God go I.

Kells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

>

> > Let it never happen again, this is after all

> East

> > Dulwich not bastard Romford.

>

> Don't you knock Romford. I should of stayed there

> :-p


And you could of, if things'd of worked out differently.

It's just where life takes us of course.

And there's HB in all sorts of hot water:


"you could of, if things'd of worked out differently"


It shouldn't be 'of' of course, but 'have', or an artfuly placed apostrophe to denote missing letters and generate 'could've'.


As in "I have done something in my trousers" or "I could have done something in my trousers" or "I could've made a message there..."

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sherwick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I just saw that I used 'too' instead of 'to' in

> a

> > sentence where the context demanded that I use

> > 'to'!

> >

> > What next? I fear that it's but a short step to

> > starting to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'

> > inappropriately, finally followed by 'loose'

> and

> > 'lose'.

> >

> > signed: Depressed in East Dulwich (aka

> Sherwick)

> >

> > :(

>

> Sherwick you should be shagging well ashamed of

> yourself, never mind what the rest of the crush

> say.

> Let it never happen again, this is after all East

> Dulwich not bastard Romford.


:(

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always worried about "I used to..." do

> something.

>

> There doesn't seem to be a conditional etc. "I was

> using to do something, and then...."


That would not be a conditional.


And I think what you are looking for would be something like "I was used to doing something, and then..."

PGC - I'm afraid I disagree with your marking, is there an appeal committee?


Huguenot - half of me is covered in shame and simpering apologetically, and the other half is thinking 'the lying get'. That said, I usually use the irony to take wrinkles out of my clothes, so am not to be considered an authority.


Sherwick, see me after class. Bring your stockholder certificates and a copy of the AGM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...