Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is anyone else pleased at the government's defeat over the question of allowing Gurkha veterans to settle in UK?


Given their years of devoted service to the British Army it seems absurd to deny Gurkha veterans the right to live here and use UK services thru' pettifogging bureaucracy and civil service rules.


I have been lucky enough to meet some Gurkha soldiers and their children who were at school with mine. Those I have met are charming, hard working and totally loyal to Britain as well as being some of the finest fighting men in the world. Of the children - one is studying medicine, another dentistry and the third economics. Their presence in UK can only benefit the country.


Politically GB has made another major error in supporting Phil Woolas and the Home Office over this matter. He is beginning to seem accident prone - always dangerous for a politician.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6138-gurkhas-gordon-brown/
Share on other sites

It was a mean spirited approach and one that seemed to completely miss the general feeling on the matter. The Home Office is clearly twitchy about the numbers involved (a max of what 35,000?). I wonder how many more Gurkhas have been killed in the service of the Crown?

Delighted for The Gurkha veterans.


Embarassing that their case should ever be contested, The Government got this so wrong.


They risks their lives for Britain and the whole Country was behind them.


Good to hear an inspiring Immigration Story after reading so many negative comments about Britain on other Websites from people who choose to reside here.

I hope I'm not spoiling it for anyone but the concluding paragraph is beautiful:


A Downing Street spokesman later added: "We've put the country ?1.4 trillion in debt, government ministers are chin-deep in sleaze and the cops are beating merry hell out of everyone. We just felt that the obvious next step was to tell thousands of heroic soldiers to go fuck themselves."

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hope I'm not spoiling it for anyone but the

> concluding paragraph is beautiful:

>

> A Downing Street spokesman later added: "We've put

> the country ?1.4 trillion in debt, government

> ministers are chin-deep in sleaze and the cops are

> beating merry hell out of everyone. We just felt

> that the obvious next step was to tell thousands

> of heroic soldiers to go @#$%& themselves."


lol...Very amoosing..:)

Alan's a bit extreme, but does have a point.


You can't just let in the Gurkhas, you have to let in the family too, and they're extended. Mebbe 100,000 to 200,000. They may be over in a snap of your fingers.


Also there's no evidence the Gurkhas fought for the Crown, more for the cash. Being a mercenary doesn't mean you share the culture, beliefs and secularism of the UK. Quite the opposite if Mark Thatcher's anything to go by.


Nepal's got a squiffy little civil war running at the moment with fundamentalist Maoists. You would be daft to imagine that the convictions of the combatants evaporate when faced with McDonalds.


It may of course all be fine, but it would be unreasonable to think that's a given.

Huguenot, how utterly mean spirited of you, I can only assume AD was being tongue in cheek.


It may be worth noting that our armed forces are under staffed and recruitment is at rock bottom, so if anything offering a stake in this society that the Nepalese, Fijians et al that this country is increasingly dependent on and are fighting for, may just be sensible pragmatic incentive.


This was such a political miscalculation by this government who had little to gain but so much political capital to lose. Just goes to highlight their general levels of incompetence really.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It may be worth noting that our armed forces are under staffed


Second largest force in Europe apparently... second only to Russia. Under-staffed for our current activities, perhaps, but not for the size of our country. Why does Britain feel the need to impose itself on the world stage so much more than other European nations do?

Yes thats the point popalopodis ! you enjoy your Bound Fruits and the youth will get themselves shanked on the fringes of ED and every now and then they will pop in in gangs of 5, mug you all for a few weeks and then read about their handywork on here !!! Thank god i live in my beautiful Nunhead, Barry road, Coldharbour lane it aint ! When you have finished tying up your fruity friends pop over one day - cemetry open day on the 16th of May, i will be there with my Bees and my Owls x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the Brixton Pound lives on, so there must be some kind of appetite for it, but I'm afraid I doubt it would be very useful for me.
    • My primary issue is the noise level and the fact that it begins at dusk and continues well into the early hours, the odd random bang being possibly the worst aspect as you never know when the next volley will occur. This is no longer about celebrating a turning point as the clock strikes 12am, but more a lengthy indulgence in ear shattering bangs, where there also seems to be competition as to who can create the loudest most startling barrage of sustained noise. A new thing is daytime fireworks, where buyers are urged to forget the visual aspect and focus on getting the biggest bang for their buck. I am lucky as I am not super sensitive to noise but I really feel for those who are. As for pets, I am afraid there are now many that require serious medication to get them through- and those meds are not cheap. The fault here is not with the animals or people sensitive to extreme bangs, but with those who insist on their right to impose it on all around them, not just for half an hour a few times a year, but for hours on customary dates and now  spreading to random events throughout the year.I  New Year fireworks is a very recent construct, and now Halloween Fireworks are becoming a thing. Why should we encourage and condone a proliferating societal noise addiction? It really is isn't healthy. Let those who wish to damage their eardrums enjoy their pastime through headphones; they can turn the volume up as high as they like.  If last night was the end of it then that is great but I think there'll be more through the weekend and more discarded jumbo firework boxes dumped in the park. I hope we follow other countries in adopting low noise fireworks and drone shows instead.    
    • NYE is always like this. If you’re concerned about your pets, please consider seeing a vet as they can help. We give our dog valerian and play calming music, which helps especially after long walks and a big dinner. If it’s for yourself, it’s one night, so also suggest seeing your doctor for advice.  It is loud, although more predictable ( kept to evening:to midnight) than Guy Fawkes celebrations which go on for days and are arguably selfish and inconsiderate. Either way, it’s a very difficult time for many.     
    • Thanks Rowan! Well done you have done amazing on your fitness journey. Happy New Year EDF and all my wonderful clients whom I've had the pleasure to train this year. I'm looking forward to 2026 🙌🎊
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...