Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone noticed that Surma aren't really marketting their restaurant as effectively as the management might have intended?


I am looking forward to seeing their "Established Winning Home" and having their "1976 Restaurant Delivery" - luckily that decor is back in vogue....


(see picture attached)

Dear Andy Pandy,


I think you have clearly lost the plot as you should be eating pudding and pie's!!


Are you sure you eat at the Surma in Dulwich, Dulwich is a very large area you may have got confused with the lower rate rating restaurants near by. I often eat at the Surma and I've always found their food exceptional and the staff are always friendly and polite, so please remind me which (Surma) did you attend??


If you note the restaurant opposite they have some dumb blonde tart staring into space writing that the food is gorgeous and the fact that Joanna Lumley eats their as well! Yeh Right!

Perhaps you may have got confused with the Mirash which is still 70's style decor (OK if you are a curry loving Abba fan).


If you walked down Lordship Lane tonight you will have noted that the Surma has more 'bums on seats' than any other restaurant - clearly that speaks that it is the more prefered venue as it offers a set buffet at the same price as other venue's.


I give my view as a Chef and critic and feel that innane comments about our revered restaurants on Lordship Lane is only bad for the area and certainly will not help the local economy.


I await your reply,

Libra Carr.

LibraCarr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear Andy Pandy,

>

> I think you have clearly lost the plot as you

> should be eating pudding and pie's!!

>

> Are you sure you eat at the Surma in Dulwich,

> Dulwich is a very large area you may have got

> confused with the lower rate rating restaurants

> near by. I often eat at the Surma and I've always

> found their food exceptional and the staff are

> always friendly and polite, so please remind me

> which (Surma) did you attend??

>

> If you note the restaurant opposite they have some

> dumb blonde tart staring into space writing that

> the food is gorgeous and the fact that Joanna

> Lumley eats their as well! Yeh Right!

> Perhaps you may have got confused with the Mirash

> which is still 70's style decor (OK if you are a

> curry loving Abba fan).

>

> If you walked down Lordship Lane tonight you will

> have noted that the Surma has more 'bums on seats'

> than any other restaurant - clearly that speaks

> that it is the more prefered venue as it offers a

> set buffet at the same price as other venue's.

>

> I give my view as a Chef and critic and feel that

> innane comments about our revered restaurants on

> Lordship Lane is only bad for the area and

> certainly will not help the local economy.

>

> I await your reply,

> Libra Carr.



To befair to Andypandy he didnt actually say he had eaten in the Surma !So I think you ought to read his post again .

Libra Carr


In almost 10 years in ED I have never eaten in Surma. I can not possibly comment on the quality of the food I'm sure it is of the highest standard. I do enjoy the odd Cuzza. However Looby Loo isn't so keen on the calorie rich treats so these days visits and far between. Needless to say when Looby Loo is next away with Martin Clunes/ Evan Davis I shall consider Surma and post my views on this forum.


I also cannot comment on the interior decor however an original 70's scheme would appeal - anyone been into Omrith lately? (dreadful decor)


I have not noticed Joanna Lumley in the restaurant opposite - you seem to say she works there...I would not call her dumb though, her recent endevours to fight the cause of the Gurkhas is not to be sniffed at. I have eaten at THAT restaurant and have found the the food is extreemly fresh and tasty (unlike the review, from the "Dumb Blond" author of Brick Lane- as you mention). Ms Ali is clearly not Blond. I suspect you were commenting on her gaze, obviously she is contemplating a desert.



As for my "innane comments", they were mearly an observation concerning the window signage and nothing more. I suspect you did not see the attached picture that I refered to in my post.


Long live ED Curry, it consumes more bytes (pun intended) than just about anything else on this Forum


AP



LibraCarr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear Andy Pandy,

>

> I think you have clearly lost the plot as you

> should be eating pudding and pie's!!

>

> Are you sure you eat at the Surma in Dulwich,

> Dulwich is a very large area you may have got

> confused with the lower rate rating restaurants

> near by. I often eat at the Surma and I've always

> found their food exceptional and the staff are

> always friendly and polite, so please remind me

> which (Surma) did you attend??

>

> If you note the restaurant opposite they have some

> dumb blonde tart staring into space writing that

> the food is gorgeous and the fact that Joanna

> Lumley eats their as well! Yeh Right!

> Perhaps you may have got confused with the Mirash

> which is still 70's style decor (OK if you are a

> curry loving Abba fan).

>

> If you walked down Lordship Lane tonight you will

> have noted that the Surma has more 'bums on seats'

> than any other restaurant - clearly that speaks

> that it is the more prefered venue as it offers a

> set buffet at the same price as other venue's.

>

> I give my view as a Chef and critic and feel that

> innane comments about our revered restaurants on

> Lordship Lane is only bad for the area and

> certainly will not help the local economy.

>

> I await your reply,

> Libra Carr.

LibraCarr - why so touchy? What's with the bitchy comments about Tandoori Nights? Is there a vested interest here perchance?


I eat a lot of curry... and I mean a LOT... Surma is firmly in the "bog-standard" bracket. The milder dishes are bland, the hotter dishes are one-dimensional, both are too greasy. The one time I had meat from the tandoor, it was far too tough.

andypandy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would a moderator step in here and redirect this

> thread to the several thousand previous threads on

> the topic of Best Curry house in East

> Dulwich....................


xxxxxx


Erm, the thread isn't actually about the best curry house in ED, andypandy ......

I know, I started the thread - I meant not re-direct the whole thread rather than the comments that were going into what the best curry house in ED is .. Ahhhh I give up... !!


Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> andypandy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Would a moderator step in here and redirect

> this

> > thread to the several thousand previous threads

> on

> > the topic of Best Curry house in East

> > Dulwich....................

>

> xxxxxx

>

> Erm, the thread isn't actually about the best

> curry house in ED, andypandy ......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...