Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone noticed that Surma aren't really marketting their restaurant as effectively as the management might have intended?


I am looking forward to seeing their "Established Winning Home" and having their "1976 Restaurant Delivery" - luckily that decor is back in vogue....


(see picture attached)

Dear Andy Pandy,


I think you have clearly lost the plot as you should be eating pudding and pie's!!


Are you sure you eat at the Surma in Dulwich, Dulwich is a very large area you may have got confused with the lower rate rating restaurants near by. I often eat at the Surma and I've always found their food exceptional and the staff are always friendly and polite, so please remind me which (Surma) did you attend??


If you note the restaurant opposite they have some dumb blonde tart staring into space writing that the food is gorgeous and the fact that Joanna Lumley eats their as well! Yeh Right!

Perhaps you may have got confused with the Mirash which is still 70's style decor (OK if you are a curry loving Abba fan).


If you walked down Lordship Lane tonight you will have noted that the Surma has more 'bums on seats' than any other restaurant - clearly that speaks that it is the more prefered venue as it offers a set buffet at the same price as other venue's.


I give my view as a Chef and critic and feel that innane comments about our revered restaurants on Lordship Lane is only bad for the area and certainly will not help the local economy.


I await your reply,

Libra Carr.

LibraCarr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear Andy Pandy,

>

> I think you have clearly lost the plot as you

> should be eating pudding and pie's!!

>

> Are you sure you eat at the Surma in Dulwich,

> Dulwich is a very large area you may have got

> confused with the lower rate rating restaurants

> near by. I often eat at the Surma and I've always

> found their food exceptional and the staff are

> always friendly and polite, so please remind me

> which (Surma) did you attend??

>

> If you note the restaurant opposite they have some

> dumb blonde tart staring into space writing that

> the food is gorgeous and the fact that Joanna

> Lumley eats their as well! Yeh Right!

> Perhaps you may have got confused with the Mirash

> which is still 70's style decor (OK if you are a

> curry loving Abba fan).

>

> If you walked down Lordship Lane tonight you will

> have noted that the Surma has more 'bums on seats'

> than any other restaurant - clearly that speaks

> that it is the more prefered venue as it offers a

> set buffet at the same price as other venue's.

>

> I give my view as a Chef and critic and feel that

> innane comments about our revered restaurants on

> Lordship Lane is only bad for the area and

> certainly will not help the local economy.

>

> I await your reply,

> Libra Carr.



To befair to Andypandy he didnt actually say he had eaten in the Surma !So I think you ought to read his post again .

Libra Carr


In almost 10 years in ED I have never eaten in Surma. I can not possibly comment on the quality of the food I'm sure it is of the highest standard. I do enjoy the odd Cuzza. However Looby Loo isn't so keen on the calorie rich treats so these days visits and far between. Needless to say when Looby Loo is next away with Martin Clunes/ Evan Davis I shall consider Surma and post my views on this forum.


I also cannot comment on the interior decor however an original 70's scheme would appeal - anyone been into Omrith lately? (dreadful decor)


I have not noticed Joanna Lumley in the restaurant opposite - you seem to say she works there...I would not call her dumb though, her recent endevours to fight the cause of the Gurkhas is not to be sniffed at. I have eaten at THAT restaurant and have found the the food is extreemly fresh and tasty (unlike the review, from the "Dumb Blond" author of Brick Lane- as you mention). Ms Ali is clearly not Blond. I suspect you were commenting on her gaze, obviously she is contemplating a desert.



As for my "innane comments", they were mearly an observation concerning the window signage and nothing more. I suspect you did not see the attached picture that I refered to in my post.


Long live ED Curry, it consumes more bytes (pun intended) than just about anything else on this Forum


AP



LibraCarr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear Andy Pandy,

>

> I think you have clearly lost the plot as you

> should be eating pudding and pie's!!

>

> Are you sure you eat at the Surma in Dulwich,

> Dulwich is a very large area you may have got

> confused with the lower rate rating restaurants

> near by. I often eat at the Surma and I've always

> found their food exceptional and the staff are

> always friendly and polite, so please remind me

> which (Surma) did you attend??

>

> If you note the restaurant opposite they have some

> dumb blonde tart staring into space writing that

> the food is gorgeous and the fact that Joanna

> Lumley eats their as well! Yeh Right!

> Perhaps you may have got confused with the Mirash

> which is still 70's style decor (OK if you are a

> curry loving Abba fan).

>

> If you walked down Lordship Lane tonight you will

> have noted that the Surma has more 'bums on seats'

> than any other restaurant - clearly that speaks

> that it is the more prefered venue as it offers a

> set buffet at the same price as other venue's.

>

> I give my view as a Chef and critic and feel that

> innane comments about our revered restaurants on

> Lordship Lane is only bad for the area and

> certainly will not help the local economy.

>

> I await your reply,

> Libra Carr.

LibraCarr - why so touchy? What's with the bitchy comments about Tandoori Nights? Is there a vested interest here perchance?


I eat a lot of curry... and I mean a LOT... Surma is firmly in the "bog-standard" bracket. The milder dishes are bland, the hotter dishes are one-dimensional, both are too greasy. The one time I had meat from the tandoor, it was far too tough.

andypandy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would a moderator step in here and redirect this

> thread to the several thousand previous threads on

> the topic of Best Curry house in East

> Dulwich....................


xxxxxx


Erm, the thread isn't actually about the best curry house in ED, andypandy ......

I know, I started the thread - I meant not re-direct the whole thread rather than the comments that were going into what the best curry house in ED is .. Ahhhh I give up... !!


Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> andypandy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Would a moderator step in here and redirect

> this

> > thread to the several thousand previous threads

> on

> > the topic of Best Curry house in East

> > Dulwich....................

>

> xxxxxx

>

> Erm, the thread isn't actually about the best

> curry house in ED, andypandy ......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...