Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On another thread (which I don't want to hijack) someone said this.

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting!

>

> I'm guessing the researchers omitted to read the

> EDF Lounge postings of some of the regular

> moaners, complainers and nay-sayers!

>

> Out in the real world though, this doesn't

> surprise me - ED/SE22 is a great place to live. I

> love it.



So is the EDF truly representative of East Dulwich?


For what it's worth, I don't think it is. It's representative of a large number of residents, but another large number are very much under represented.


Hoping for a discussion rather than a load of the usual.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> For what it's worth, I don't think it is. It's

> representative of a large number of residents, but

> another large number are very much under

> represented.


Under 18's definitely fall into the latter, and to a lesser extent the over 60's.



> Hoping for a discussion rather than a load of the

> usual.


Good luck! :)

Think it's pretty obvious that it's not representative. It's comprised mainly of people with cushy office jobs. Or cushy "work-from-home" jobs.


Anyone who actually has to work hard for a living (including the much maligned "yummy mummies") don't have time to spend on here.

This forum is not representative of ED generally, no. In fact it does sometimes irk me how people who don't really know the area, but have read the forum, assume certain things (generally negative) about the are which I wouldn't personally hold to be true.

If the views of everyone here on EDF were the same, then a comparison could be made with the rest of E.D. residents.


But as peoples views of EDF users and the views of Non EDF users will both differ no real conclusion of any

relevant representation can be made....


Life goes on with or without EDF. and in the long run EDF has no more influence over what happens in the

community that what other people are doing.


DulwichFox

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Think it's pretty obvious that it's not

> representative. It's comprised mainly of people

> with cushy office jobs. Or cushy "work-from-home"

> jobs.

>

> Anyone who actually has to work hard for a living

> (including the much maligned "yummy mummies")

> don't have time to spend on here.



So true. Totally agree.


ETA: The top part of the post rather than the bottom, after what Otta said!

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Think it's pretty obvious that it's not

> representative. It's comprised mainly of people

> with cushy office jobs. Or cushy "work-from-home"

> jobs.

>

> Anyone who actually has to work hard for a living

> (including the much maligned "yummy mummies")

> don't have time to spend on here.


Also, people who have retired, as well as those who just don't get out much, preferring (or needing, for whatever reason) to spend their time in front of a computer screen in a virtual world.

It has over the years spawned some of the best threads ever. Breast feeding in the MIND Shop was absolute gold! But as with other sections, a lot of former posters have drifted away. Possibly because they're past that early stages when parenthood feels so new and exciting, but I know a few that just got fed up.

Definitely not representative however I'd say that's true for most forums of this kind.


Ed issues section probably captures the hot topics but generally posters tend to have similar views although it may not seem that way at times. The lounge just has older (40s and upwards I'd say) posters who enjoy the humour and banter. The multiple logins that agree with themselves are faintly amusing I guess. Don't think young ones bother posting much.


Agree with Jeremy on those with time on their hands posting more or else those who are bored at work and have the added bonus of being able to participate. I used to post more when I had a cushy work from home number now I'm doing long hours that's all come to a sad end. Apart from the recent *Bob* and *Louisa* head to head over cinema prices (classic!) it's been dull here anyway. I don't think good ol' SJ lurks anymore either I can't feel his presence. Worried we are losing el pibe too. Hooch, Brendan, Ted, Rosie abd Moos much missed.


Some interesting new posters worth reading though so not all bad. Not in SE22 anymore though I suspect I'm in the majority there in the lounge at least.

I don't think young people, hell even those under 30s, use forums at all so I am not sure this is even sligthly representative. It's all verry old fashioned - they're all Instanting or to busy having sex off Tinder/Grinder etc.


Certainly the vast majority of frequent lounge posters that I know are 40+ or near that milestone. and those that I don't suggest they are aronud that range in terms of their likes/dislikes topics etc.


Forums are for oldies.

Of the posters so far, how many live in ED? Has anyone never lived in ED?

If a large percentage of EDF users don't live here then it must dilute how representative it is of ED itself.

I live here, but if you were to merge all ED males into one being, I might make it as a fingernail.


Forums may be old fashioned but I wonder how many under 30's who aren't kids actually live here. Maybe the EDF users would be closer to being representative of ED if that were true...


Anyway, I must try this........blow ins


ETA Did I spell it wrong?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...