Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blears thinks it's her, blunkett will want it too. John Reid is the only one they could sell to the public. Harman could be the john major candidate, but she's tainted by sleaze, cynicism and Blair.

The broomites will put someone like balls into the mix. Ed Milliband is the closest I've seen tow decent politician on their ranks, but basically they are doomed and quite rightly so.

Alan Johnson would be my choice. I like Ed Miliband a lot but he's too young and inexperienced.


John Reid is out. No way would the public have another dour Scot in No10.


Blears isn't popular enough with the rank and file, ditto Blunkett.


Harman would be a good outside bet but I'd want better odds than 6-1. She was dismissed too easily in the Deputy Leader elections and any other candidates would underestimate her again at their peril.

Nah I think AFN is referring to Harriott Harman being next Home Secretary.


Gordon Brown is still the right person in charge for Labour - assuming they want to win the next General Election which they should do when you consider the Tories. The way David Cameron has ruthlessly dealt with his own colleagues over expenses suggests he'd not think twice about savaging things like the NHS and Education. Who would you trust Brown or Cameron?

I would suggest that all Labour Politicians are experiencing cognitive dissonance - the holding of two totally contradictory ideas at once.


They believe that they have the right and ability to be in power and wine the next election - but at the same time they hear everyone else rubbishing this idea and telling them that they're on the way out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...