Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I had this comment from someone last week:

"Oh East Dulwich... I hear it's the Sante Fe of South east London !"


....perhaps slightly over the top but nice to hear !


Generally people have heard positive things about ED - what responses have you had ?

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I take great pleasure in telling people I live in

> Peckham, and watching their faces.



They usually dredge up some half-remembered thing about Damilola Taylor, or the 5 minutes of Ross Kemp on Gangs they watched the other night from my past experience.


They usually live somewhere like Homerton themselves and don't appreciate the irony.

I too get, oh you mean Peckham.


Or - that North London thing that they think the river is about 15 miles wide and so anywhere in South London is miles away.


Occasionally people think it's somewhere in the country (Kent/Surrey?) but I used to get that loads when I lived in Camberwell, "Oh in leafy Surrey" which a lot of people think is Camberley I guess

yeah i tell them i bought my gaff in 97 for practically fuckall, and now its worth shitloads.


actually i don,t, i tell them ed was a bit of a shithole in the 90,s when i first moved in but its better now if a little bit poncy in parts.

Question asked by fellow passaengers on a cruise who were wearing football shirts.....when they didnt know where East Dulwich was I said near Peckham.......

"and what football team do you support then?" they asked....."MILLWALL"!!!! says I


"AWWW they smashed up our new stadium"

LOL magic!!!!

Also get the I'd never live somewhere that doesn't have a tube. Generally followed by some explanation of why they'd never live that far out of London. Then they seem shocked at it being zone 2 but still think it's too far out.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I take great pleasure in telling people I live in

> Peckham, and watching their faces.



Do you tell them 'well there's Peckham, Peckham and Peckham" and then explain the difference, esp the part about the Bellenden Conservation Area! Or the Goose Green Triangle. Is there any other estate agent lingo I've forgotten?

"Where do you live?"

"East Dulwich"

"Oh, where's that? Kent?"

"No, South London"

"What's the nearest tube station?"

"There's no tube actually"

"Is it actually in London, or Surrey? Or Kent?"

"It's in London. Near Peckham and Camberwell".

"Oh... sounds nice..."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • the same complaint was made about usa news stations 4 years ago.  its an old story. Its quite shocking how intelligent people are so easily manipulated. I
    • With slightly less respect Headnun I have  watched the 1 hour video - he said what he said and he did what he did. And his faux-wink wink “no violence people” fools no one but fools. Are you a fool?    the bbc told the truth - and it’s a straight up lie to say otherwise. Did they edit and cut to the chase to make a point? Absolutely  and correctly  he was not edited to say things he didn’t say  I cannot believe you watched the entire video and are trying to say the bbc edit somehow misrepresented what he said and Back in the real world - did the nutters who showed up at the white house materialise because of a bbc edit ffs - have some self respect and recognise what’s going on 
    • Friends and family in the 'States always say how wonderful it is to be in Britain and see our news coverage.  It's all partisan out there. The BBC manages to simultaneously p off the left and the right so must be doing something right.
    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...