Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As long as Federer is playing, you have to consider him on Wimbledon's grass. And it's true that his life is gonna be easier with Nadal's withdrawal. But Murray's beaten him. He's clearly closer to the end of his career than he is from the beginning of it. Roger certainly isn't the automatic choice he has been in the past. I think Murray can do it.
Well we've had plenty of opinions on cyclists. We don't like to be as stuffy as the prudes in Sydenham although some of the regular posters live there. Read through the threads and you'll get a general idea of how things are done here. You wont look back I can assure you.
Difficult to call. Federer may be more relaxed and confident now he's equalled Pete Sampras's record. Then again he may now be sated and no longer hungry enough. Personally I think there are some very good players in the men's. Gonzales is a good player and Nalbandian is a dark horse.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Er...excuse me, Top gear have just revealed

> Michael Schumcher as the Stig. He took his helmet

> off in front of the audience. I don't know about

> you but Neil Armstrong's jaunt around the Moon

> pales in comparison!!!


Seriously???!!

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really BBW - have just turned on the TV.

>

> So all those people with the "I am the Stig" T

> shirts were filty lyers - the same people as uesd

> to wear the JR T shirts. Scum.


I like what you did there Mic Mack. Ommitting the 'H'from filthy, really conveyed your Oirish accent. You did however slip up in failing to include 'oi' between 'L' and 'Y' in 'lyers'. Still, very sporting of you none the less.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
    • Hi all, I highly recommend Rob Mills Gas Safe boiler engineer, helpful and knowledgeable. contact number 07952584171    
    • I don't think a single all-inclusive URL is easily doable.  When you enter a search the system presents the result without any of one's search parameters added to the URL.  So I suggest you go to https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/search.do?action=advanced where you just need to enter the address -- use SE22 8EW -- and the  Date Received start date.  I used 1/1/2025.  The three Tesco applications, all minor things, were all made in May.  The Simple search that I'd done previously had no time limit, and didn't include anything else that might have been from Tesco in the last two years. Incidentally, when I searched on the address 29-35 Lordship Lane it did not pick up the Tesco applications, which were held as 29 - 35 Lordship Lane Grrr!  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...