Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh it is difficult for one to say, as I, like you, tend to migrate toward East Dulwich on those rare occassions when I am able to venture out.


I do apologise for assumming you don't give custom to dear Camberwell regularly. Foolish of me. Why don't we reverse the question and give you platform for telling us all the wonderful places you frequent here? We do have a new French bistro, apparently. Quite good I'm told.

Oh I am sorry. I must follow the rules, of course. I guess my heart sinks when I see the architectural gems that are the finest in the area (they certainly beat East Dulwich) covered and coated in muck and garbage. Underneath it all is a proud past now drowned out by such horrible noise.

Maurice


What is that pub up in Walworth, down a side turning near Arments & next to the theatrical set building place that backs onto the estate ?


Do you know it



Now that is a sh1thole of a place, had a funny few times in there though.


looked in the A-Z (what a book eh ) it's on Westmoreland rd/Queens row ( funnily enough )


W**F

Walworth?! Now I know you are winding one up. As South London goes, and we're talking urban (as opposed to our suburban enclaves), The Prince of Wales in Cleaver Square is good for a drink and boules, if desired. Otherwise, travel north or out to suburbia (Lordship Lane springs to mind).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No photograph taken and no video evidence of anyone approaching or ringing my doorbell all morning. I have made a complaint to EVRI, but just in case anyone has taken in or found some James Wellbeloved Senior dry catfood on their doorstep ... I am at the South Circular/Horniman end of Underhill.
    • I may have missed it, but I don't think anyone has made that argument have they?  I don't know, but suspect they've figured the costs of cancelling at this late stage are greater than the costs of losing another legal challenge. I agree that if so, it's putting commercial considerations over legal process.
    • Honestly don't know what Lambeth are thinking - they should consider their reputation, loss of public trust, legal challenges and findings of maladministration. Perhaps they have and don't care. It stinks of commercial bias and contempt for the legal process and public.  
    • If the argument was 'all councils are bad' that would be clearly true, but as much of the debate has been about 'once a council is elected, what it does is right and mandated' I think there is greater merit in using this as a debating point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...