Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Walworth?! Now I know you are winding one up. As

> South London goes, and we're talking urban (as

> opposed to our suburban enclaves), The Prince of

> Wales in Cleaver Square is good for a drink and

> boules, if desired. Otherwise, travel north or

> out to suburbia (Lordship Lane springs to mind).



Oh Maurice , gone all la de da now, what with bistro's & "boules" & they call it "petanque" on here , also they get upset if you call them tossers, which of course they are.


Back to the real world, what's wrong with Walworth "The Bell" is lovely, I know that geezer got shot in the head in there but he was an IRA informant. I mean it's not exactly Dorset but......Please don't mention the Fox or somewhere like that or it will be one short "mornington cresent " stop before someone pipes up with "Oh early bird at the Harvester is good ?2.99 for ...." sh1t like that and the whole thread goes down.



Next....& Hurry please.



W**F

I'm afraid pubs are not my cup of tea, so to speak. It is difficult for me to get out at all and when I do, it is not to pubs. I can offer you an afternoon drink in the front drawing room or, given our lovely weather, the garden. It is much quieter and better quality than anything local.


There is the Doves, which I've never visited but seems to get a lot of positive press. The young man behind it is constantly raising his and his pub's profile. T

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You seem a bit jealous *Bob*.



I agree it's a lovely house.


It must get annoying fishing beer cans and condoms out of your front garden most mornings though.


Not to mention stepping in vom when you open the door for Ocado.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Be careful, Woof.

>

> Many go in. None come out.

-------------------------------------------------------



Yes, caution is "key". I hear his patio is up to the basement window sill height this year.


In & out....relentlessly....that's what worries me......

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan I do worry about you dear boy.


> Have you suffered a job loss? Is all okay over on

> the estate?


Yes, I'm afraid Alan lost the paper round.


But he's managed to find seasonal work in 'Rimworld', so it's not all bad news.

Bob I fear you are right. And the boom boom cars to boot.


My summer garden parties were once the talk of the Society calendar. The Camberwell Society that is. I cannot recall anyone not leaving, but my mind isn't what it once was, so you could be right. I just thought most of us were now house bound or dead.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maurice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan I do worry about you dear boy.

>

> > Have you suffered a job loss? Is all okay over

> on

> > the estate?

>

> Yes, I'm afraid Alan lost the paper round.

>

> But he's managed to find seasonal work in

> 'Rimworld', so it's not all bad news.


------------------------------------------------


And the hourly rates are good!

United in poor taste then - good stuff.


Rest assured, if there had been a more entertainingly-named shop in Camberwell selling sporting and fashion goods (say, "Fellatio World", or perhaps "Beanflicker City" etc) then I would have gone for that.


Alas, Rimworld is the best there is - by a country mile.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...