Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lovely Kalam, I enjoy mild flirtation online as much as the next person, but genuinely, this forum can read like the dialogue of juviniles behind the bike sheds. I genuinely don't like this line of conversation about me. I have a fabulous husband who I adore and this conversation is base and rude.

I feel quite dirty having started this thread. My interest is not remotely romantic, merely an effort to fill the table with charming guests. One means no harm, nor did I, in the least, mean to mock your social climbing. Indeed it is to be respected. I believe we must cultivate our aspirational culture.


I am resigned to the same boring blue rinse brigade who will put on the facade of wealth, but attempt to sneak out bits of my dwindling silver collection.

It's not you that should feel dirty Maurice.....it's me. You started this thread with very good intentions but unfortuanatly had the misfortune of having your thread hijacked by the likes of myself. I have no idea what dulwichmum wrote in her edited post but I think I deserved every last word judging by my licentious railroading with regards to casting a cloud of doubt over her offline fidelity. I simply get carried away sometimes but hopefully everyone will see it as that and nothing else.


I'll get back in my box now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...