Jump to content

?Rob da Bank? ? robbed of imagination?

kanga

By kanga
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

kanga

kanga

Posted
Posted

So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich as there are ?not too many suits?.


Judging someone by their occupation (or dress for that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best, and more likely just plain prejudice (Occupationalism? Dressism?)


So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing you in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every time you manage to claw a few inches in the press. Those ?suits? are probably the very same demographic that are tuned in to your middle-of-the-road choonz, man.


And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic choice of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t inherit your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.


Rant over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horsebox

Horsebox

Posted
Posted
Didn't know he was local. I wonder if he'll give me a lift to Bestival this year? Also, any chance of a free programme? I thought charging ?5 for them was a pisstake at least, after the not so cheap ticket price and the rain. Can't you do anything about the rain, rob?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark

Mark

Posted
Posted

Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There are not too many suits", not because "There are not any suits" there's subtle difference.


And having a go at someone (who you have to admit is pretty good and successful even without a suit) because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted
even i have heard of him. But did not know what he did. Good that he is local. I agree ed does not have many suits. I have to wear one but im glad most people here do not have to otherwise ed would prob not have the the character it has. So i agree with rob da banker.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
flapjackdavey

flapjackdavey

Posted
Posted

kanga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich as

> there are ?not too many suits?.

>

> Judging someone by their occupation (or dress for

> that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best, and

> more likely just plain prejudice (Occupationalism?

> Dressism?)

>

> So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing you

> in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every time

> you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> demographic that are tuned in to your

> middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

>

> And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic choice

> of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t inherit

> your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.

>

> Rant over.



" so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social shorhand ? , leave the guy alone .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
flapjackdavey

flapjackdavey

Posted
Posted

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are

> you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There

> are not too many suits", not because "There are

> not any suits" there's subtle difference.

>

> And having a go at someone (who you have to admit

> is pretty good and successful even without a suit)

> because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going

> out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?



excellent :)-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Santerme

Santerme

Posted
Posted

flapjackdavey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kanga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> > freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich

> as

> > there are ?not too many suits?.

> >

> > Judging someone by their occupation (or dress

> for

> > that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best,

> and

> > more likely just plain prejudice

> (Occupationalism?

> > Dressism?)

> >

> > So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing

> you

> > in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every

> time

> > you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> > Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> > demographic that are tuned in to your

> > middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

> >

> > And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic

> choice

> > of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t

> inherit

> > your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.

> >

> > Rant over.

>

>

> " so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social

> shorhand ? .... who the hell are you anyway ? ,

> leave the guy alone .



Four edits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
flapjackdavey

flapjackdavey

Posted
Posted

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> flapjackdavey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > kanga Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> > > freesheets that he likes living in East

> Dulwich

> > as

> > > there are ?not too many suits?.

> > >

> > > Judging someone by their occupation (or dress

> > for

> > > that matter) is lazy social shorthand at

> best,

> > and

> > > more likely just plain prejudice

> > (Occupationalism?

> > > Dressism?)

> > >

> > > So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing

> > you

> > > in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every

> > time

> > > you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> > > Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> > > demographic that are tuned in to your

> > > middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

> > >

> > > And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic

> > choice

> > > of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t

> > inherit

> > > your narrow-mindedness and lack of

> imagination.

> > >

> > > Rant over.

> >

> >

> > " so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social

> > shorhand ? .... who the hell are you anyway ? ,

> > leave the guy alone .

>

>

> Four edits?



yep

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keef

Keef

Posted
Posted
Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There are not too many suits", not because "There are not any suits" there's subtle difference.


And having a go at someone (who you have to admit is pretty good and successful even without a suit) because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?



Bit harsh for you Mark, is Rob your mate or something?


Personally, I'm with Kanga, I think he looks and sounds like the son of

, the mockney tw@t!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

If I walk into a pub populated by people in suits, I try to get out as quickly as possibly.


Nothing personal about the people in the suits individually, but suits en masse = a load of people tenuously connected by a workplace they despise, feeling obliged to go out for a drink with colleagues in order to drone on about what happened in the office that week and perhaps try to get off with someone which undoubtedly they will come to regret come Monday morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fear 'n boozin

Fear 'n boozin

Posted
Posted

I'd like to think that I'd walk out of a pub full of suited types too, but then I'm thinking that'd be a pub in the city, and I wouldn't bother going there anyway. I'd also like to think I'd walk out of a pub full of people with names like Rob the Bank, let's call it the Bishop.


Lol keif.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brendan

Brendan

Posted
Posted

kanga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ... plain prejudice (Occupationalism?

> Dressism?)

>

> So piss off, you crusty...


HUMAN BEING IN INABILITY TO RECOGNISE THE BLATANT CONTRADICTORY NATURE OF THEIR OWN ARGUMENT - SHOCKER!



Edit: For our good and the good of all his church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Rockets
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Rockets · Posted

      But you have to assess whether these persistent drivers are creating more safety issues than diverting emergency vehicles on a longer route and clearly they are not. The fact members of the pro-closure lobby have built their argument on this actually shows how desperate, some would say selfish, they are to have the junction closed and just the way they want it. And unfortunately they seem to have the council over a barrel on something as the council weakly concedes to their position without hesitation. Was this not borne from an FOI that said one of the emergency services confirmed that they had not been consulted on the new DV design that Cllr Leeming then said was actually a mistake by the emergency services - and then it's a case of whether you believe Cllr Leeming or not....and his track record is hardly unblemished when it comes to all things LTNs? Exactly! When the "small vocal minority" was given a mouthpiece that proved it was anything other than small then some have repeatedly tried to discredit the mouthpiece.  The far-left has never been very good at accountability and One Dulwich is forcing our local councillors and council to be accountable to constituents and it wouldn't surprise me if the council are behind a lot of the depositioning activities as One Dulwich is stopping them from getting CPZs rolled out and must be seen as a huge thorn in the side of the idealogical plan they have. Southwark Labour has a long track record of trying to stifle constituents with a view that differs from theirs (see Cllr Leo Pollack for one example) or depositioning anyone trying to represent them (see Cllr Williams during the infamous Cllr Rose "mansplaining" episode. But you know, ome think it's One Dulwich that are the greatest threat to local democracy and should not be trusted! 😉
    • GinSpark
      ED Nature Watch

      By GinSpark · Posted

      A song thrush visited my back garden today. I watched as it smashed open a snail by whacking it against the patio.
    • Earl Aelfheah
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      I have no doubt that local people are genuinely involved (and personally can understand their not wanting to publicise their involvement). That said the proliferation of One groups across London and the degree of co-ordination suggests it is more than just a local grassroots group. I’m not really that interested, except that many of their supporters do bang on about transparency and accountability. I would be interested in the substance of their latest missive. Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through due to inadequate signage? Sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. It feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes tbh.
    • Froglander
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By Froglander · Posted

      It is very odd.  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...