Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich as there are ?not too many suits?.


Judging someone by their occupation (or dress for that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best, and more likely just plain prejudice (Occupationalism? Dressism?)


So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing you in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every time you manage to claw a few inches in the press. Those ?suits? are probably the very same demographic that are tuned in to your middle-of-the-road choonz, man.


And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic choice of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t inherit your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.


Rant over.

Didn't know he was local. I wonder if he'll give me a lift to Bestival this year? Also, any chance of a free programme? I thought charging ?5 for them was a pisstake at least, after the not so cheap ticket price and the rain. Can't you do anything about the rain, rob?

Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There are not too many suits", not because "There are not any suits" there's subtle difference.


And having a go at someone (who you have to admit is pretty good and successful even without a suit) because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?

even i have heard of him. But did not know what he did. Good that he is local. I agree ed does not have many suits. I have to wear one but im glad most people here do not have to otherwise ed would prob not have the the character it has. So i agree with rob da banker.

kanga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich as

> there are ?not too many suits?.

>

> Judging someone by their occupation (or dress for

> that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best, and

> more likely just plain prejudice (Occupationalism?

> Dressism?)

>

> So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing you

> in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every time

> you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> demographic that are tuned in to your

> middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

>

> And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic choice

> of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t inherit

> your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.

>

> Rant over.



" so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social shorhand ? , leave the guy alone .

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are

> you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There

> are not too many suits", not because "There are

> not any suits" there's subtle difference.

>

> And having a go at someone (who you have to admit

> is pretty good and successful even without a suit)

> because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going

> out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?



excellent :)-D

flapjackdavey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kanga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> > freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich

> as

> > there are ?not too many suits?.

> >

> > Judging someone by their occupation (or dress

> for

> > that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best,

> and

> > more likely just plain prejudice

> (Occupationalism?

> > Dressism?)

> >

> > So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing

> you

> > in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every

> time

> > you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> > Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> > demographic that are tuned in to your

> > middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

> >

> > And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic

> choice

> > of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t

> inherit

> > your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.

> >

> > Rant over.

>

>

> " so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social

> shorhand ? .... who the hell are you anyway ? ,

> leave the guy alone .



Four edits?

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> flapjackdavey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > kanga Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> > > freesheets that he likes living in East

> Dulwich

> > as

> > > there are ?not too many suits?.

> > >

> > > Judging someone by their occupation (or dress

> > for

> > > that matter) is lazy social shorthand at

> best,

> > and

> > > more likely just plain prejudice

> > (Occupationalism?

> > > Dressism?)

> > >

> > > So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing

> > you

> > > in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every

> > time

> > > you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> > > Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> > > demographic that are tuned in to your

> > > middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

> > >

> > > And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic

> > choice

> > > of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t

> > inherit

> > > your narrow-mindedness and lack of

> imagination.

> > >

> > > Rant over.

> >

> >

> > " so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social

> > shorhand ? .... who the hell are you anyway ? ,

> > leave the guy alone .

>

>

> Four edits?



yep

Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There are not too many suits", not because "There are not any suits" there's subtle difference.


And having a go at someone (who you have to admit is pretty good and successful even without a suit) because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?



Bit harsh for you Mark, is Rob your mate or something?


Personally, I'm with Kanga, I think he looks and sounds like the son of

, the mockney tw@t!

If I walk into a pub populated by people in suits, I try to get out as quickly as possibly.


Nothing personal about the people in the suits individually, but suits en masse = a load of people tenuously connected by a workplace they despise, feeling obliged to go out for a drink with colleagues in order to drone on about what happened in the office that week and perhaps try to get off with someone which undoubtedly they will come to regret come Monday morning.

I'd like to think that I'd walk out of a pub full of suited types too, but then I'm thinking that'd be a pub in the city, and I wouldn't bother going there anyway. I'd also like to think I'd walk out of a pub full of people with names like Rob the Bank, let's call it the Bishop.


Lol keif.

kanga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ... plain prejudice (Occupationalism?

> Dressism?)

>

> So piss off, you crusty...


HUMAN BEING IN INABILITY TO RECOGNISE THE BLATANT CONTRADICTORY NATURE OF THEIR OWN ARGUMENT - SHOCKER!



Edit: For our good and the good of all his church.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...