Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Personally, when in the middle of a tense-ish debate/barney, sometimes it feels important to be clear that it's typos etc, not a sudden change of heart or loss of bottle. maybe that's just me. sorry for the offensive unnecessary explanations of the past.



(not edited, looks about right. it is late, though)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-225683
Share on other sites

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Once something has been posted it should be locked

> - if you need to correct an opinion do it in the

> next post... if people are worried about spelling

> and grammer mistakes then they shouldn't be so

> trigger happy hitting 'Post message'

---------------------------------------------------


Yeah................... so there.......


Think about it kidsz.............."Take resposibility"..


trigger happy knob jockeys



Now your scared "made you look , made you stare "

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-225730
Share on other sites

Here here Mic Mack. It's pathetic isn't it. What I can't stand apart from emocions or whatever they're called is when people do this:


*something descriptive of a physical action that relates to the post*


Far too easy if you ask me.



Edited 101 time(s). Last edit was today, 10.37am by Louisiana.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-225795
Share on other sites

Depends entirely on the context. In the forthcoming serious discussion room then quite right that emoticons and actions are contemptuous or at the very least annoying, but much on here is essentially conversational which is a physical activity with gestures, expressions and eye contact (or not). None of which exists here, making nuances, irony and physical embellishment nigh on impossible and suddenly posts become very very easy to misinterpret.


Until somebody comes up with a decent mechanism to emulate this we're left with exclamations, emoticons and *shrugs* stage directions.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-225802
Share on other sites

It's quite simple really... there are a fair few on here prepared to jump on others for "backtracking" what they originally put just for simply realising they may have either been a little rash or found there's no point to one comment or other as it has been taken completely out of context.


Please feel free to disagree. B)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-225826
Share on other sites

I don't mind emoticons at all, especially in light hearted threads. I don't use them all the time, but I do like the :-S one, as it seems to sum up my general confusion sometimes.


People that get wound up about this sort of thing really need to take a look at the world. There are more important things to worry about.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-225861
Share on other sites

This is just bloody outragous!


I pop out to the pub and when I get back I'm being attacked on all fronts. Kel has mercilessly rejected my honourable advances, Mick Mac and Quids are ganging up on me, Legal has got everyone making fun of me (insinuating that I'm a shandy drinker of all things) and now Moos is swearing at me along with Brendan.


Is an Englishman not safe in his glass house any more?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-226060
Share on other sites

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> *thinks - if that wasn't a special clique

> handshake, what was it?!*



Well it depends entirely on what part of Quids you shook. If it was his hand that's fine but if it was his..well..you know, then you two may well be in a clique of you very own.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7063-edited-for/#findComment-226083
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything.
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...