Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Feeling a bit sore after coming off my bike last week, and a 'friend of a friend' (OK, my mother-in-laws best friends dippy, several-sandwiches-short-of-a-picnic, in fact at times frankly f*ckwitted, daughter) has suggested arnica as being a good homeopathic remedy for bruising, etc.


So I thought I'd ask some sensible, intelligent people if they reckon it does any good.


(Also thought I'd ask here, too!)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7070-arnica-any-good/
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can of worms. But in shirt no, cream is nowt but a

> moisturiser, pill is a sugar pill, let it dissolve

> in the French fashion if you like, won't make a

> blind bit of difference.

-----------------------------------------------------


Agree, wot mockers said.

Not that I've ever used it, but just because you think a lot of complementary medicines / herbal remedies are naff, doesn't mean they all are.


This is one that I have heard good things about from lots of people, including health professionals talking to Mrs Keef after childbirth, so I'd be willing to give it a go.


Vodka is much more fun though, but can actually lead to bruising (that you can't explain) in my experience.

But it's not a herbal remedy is it Keef. It's homeopathy so by it's own definition it is water with any trace ingredient so diluted that by design there is none left. So it's water with a 'memory' of arnica. Otherwise known as utter tosh.


Now a dock leaf is an entirely different matter.

To be honest I wouldn't have a clue if it's homeopathic or not, that's what the girl who suggested it to me said (but she's probably not the most reliable source about....well, anything really!).


Just trying to get patched up 'cos we're going kayaking at the weekend and a sore shoulder will take the fun out of it.


The vodka and dock leaf combo has to be a strong contender though!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...