Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I kind of love the ides of the temporary tattoo sleeve... the chance to have a different tattoo any time on a whim

http://www.giftsupplying.com/product/pic/tattoosleeve.jpg

but... then again is that a bit like making graffiti legal... sort of takes the meaning out of it


ie

tattoos = permanent

graffiti = done under cover of darkness to avoid arrest

I like tattoos, even Amy Winehouse's tattoos and I think most people who have tattoos don't really give a crap about the opinions of people who don't like them. I hate mediocre 'Gap' type clothes, but thousands of people think it's ok to walk about looking bland and boring. I wouldn't think it was my place to turn my nose up at them and criticise them for their clothes and lifestyle choices, but anti-tat people think it's acceptable to not just criticise people with tattoos, but do it in a pretty sneering way.


I'm just glad i'm me, tattos, piercings and all; and not you judgemental tat-haters.

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the way that some have justified getting

> tattoos by claiming that they have personal

> meaning. Wouldn't the same image in a book or in a

> picture on the wall would have the same meaning? I

> really like some tattoos, but pretty much detest

> others. Often it correlates with the atractiveness

> of the person thus tattooed.


Sorry to say CitizenEd that is just a load of nonsense, I know why I have tattoos and I dont have to justify myself to anyone. To say "Wouldnt the same image in a book have the same meaning" No its does not. I have just finished 2 hours of MSc critique and every so often I look at the rosary on my foot when I am feeling low and tired and it empowers me. So unless you understand and feel how I feel about my tattoos, then please do not compare it to looking at a book.

I have always felt that a tattoo brand's you, and while at the moment they seem to have become popular with various celebs they always hint at low life behaviour like having a bruiser dog instead of a pooch which is acceptable.


My sister worked in a hospital for years and the major part of her time was spent organising the removal of tattoo's where people had been revolted by there own stupidity at their "body art". Even when they are removed you can see where they were, as the skin is not the same after the op.


Guys with lots of tattoo's often suggests time in prison. I had never seen a woman with a tattoo until fairly recently, as it was generally considered to be for macho bad boys.


Nope, I think they are best left to someone else, but they are certainly not for me, not even for free.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maybe it was being rough and ready and being able

> to give a good seeing to .. oh my :))


------------------------------------------------------



Maybee he had one on his "appendage" for ladies eyes only.......





W**F

I've got a Chinese imperial dragon on my upper right arm when I was 17 I'm being deadly serious when I say I got it because I was bored and there was nothing else to do. So about an hour later I was sitting in the Tattooists chair and half way through the twin towers were attacked. No, I'll never forget that day.


Absolutely no spiritual reason or any other besides that for it being there. I've never regretted it either.


However,


I don't sympathise one bit when you get these idiots who have their entire arms or half their face done and moan when they're turned down at a job interview.


Not into piercings one bit or those tunnel earings.

OHMYGOD!!!


VILE, VILE, VILE - (stomps foot).


Tattoos are not for everyone, they are very Trailor Trash/Jeremy Kyle Show in my opinion.


I can see what some people are saying about having a childs name as a tattoo - but there are so many other things that can be done - that are not so permanent.


Check out these fabulous trinkets from Chambers and Beau.


http://chambersandbeau.com/writeable/uploads/images/resized/269w_14044_pendant-test2-web.jpg


They personalise these super necklaces with your poppets' names and your husband's name - divine!

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OHMYGOD!!!

>

> VILE, VILE, VILE - (stomps foot).

>

> Tattoos are not for everyone, they are very

> Trailor Trash/Jeremy Kyle Show in my opinion.

>

> I can see what some people are saying about having

> a childs name as a tattoo - but there are so many

> other things that can be done - that are not so

> permanent.



Like Dr Barnados, LOL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...