Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

mockney piers Wrote:

I think you may mean literary dexterity, my literal dexterity is terrble these days, can't even touch my toes.


Yes, I think you've got me there Mockney.


and he has done us all up like a kipper with "retopificating"....even Google has never heard of it....:))


Actually, Google is a joke. I come on here to improve my vocabulary, amongst other things, and an esteemed Poster uses a word those clowns at Google have never even encountered!


What does it mean, please, MP?

BBW I didn't mean anyone on here is a net geek. I was talking about the kind of person who spends this life talking about how pathetic various forums are, and yet, invests hour talking about them, and trying to damage them, in order to teach them some sort of lesson, which 4, sure is valid in their sad little geek minds. Thankfully, this forum is quite well guarded against such tools.

There are some forumites whose posts I will never read because I don't like how they post. I will skip anyone who is regularly cruel, rude, aggressive, childish, makes personal attacks etc. I'm probably not alone in that. Conversely, there are some forumites whose threads I follow even though I don't agree with a word they write, but I find their arguments compelling.


If you are going to be cruel or make personal attacks then you do need to accept that that there are forumites you will alienate in the process. Personally, I come on the forum for some light relief, not to be wound up, so I just automatically censor certain forumites by not reading their posts (or the pointless threads they start). I don't mind a good argument - let's face it they can be really amusing. For me, cruelty and rudeness cross a line - there's just no need.

bigbadwolf Wrote:


> I've no intention of speaking to any of you at a

> pub in the way I carry on here. I'd be seperated

> with most of my teeth if I did.


Ahem! That was exactly the point I was trying to put over. Why do you feel the need to be so offensive, obnoxious and rude on here when you wouldn't have the balls to behave in the same way in public if you were to meet any of us. It's exactly that kind of cowardly hiding behind the computer behaviour so gets on my wick. I know I'm not alone in feeling that way. I just don't think there is any need for it when at other times you can be an intelligent and at times witty and erudite contibutor on here.

Jah,


O.K, as I've said to Keef, I won't go round being directly offensive to you in public but I will be cheeky if I can garner a laugh out of it for everyone. Believe it or not, I can do it without hurting other peoples feelings. I'm also (as I've stated many times before) more than happy to poke fun at myself and hope others would too, for the sake of mutual humour, not to make some one feel singled out.


I feel the need to be obnoxious and rude on this site to defend myself against the type of unwarranted aggression I recieve from the likes of you and others. You are consistantly aggresive towards me, even when I'm trying to be either polite or pleasant. Yesterday was a prime example. I was minding my own business and you come along and pick a fight. I wont cower to aggression.


I suppose it's my own fault for making a bit of a name for myself when I first turned up and I've no one else to blame for this.


However,


What a lot of you don't realise is that when I'm percieved to be rude, it's often against someone who's singled me out first. I think that a lot of the resentment against me isn't because I can be rude, but because I have the 'audacity' to stick one back on my all too often, older agitator. If you can't take it, don't give it.


One last thing I don't do that I've been on the recieving end of, is sending messages containing violent intent towards the reciever. I've had these from some regular posters before and just so they know, you don't frighten me.

I've no intention of having another day like yesterday. I don't feel I've been aggressive. If I have it's in response to your rude and obnoxious tone. Like you say "if you can't take it don't dish it out."


If people have sent you violent and threatening personal messages then that is bang out of order and you should report them. But have you thought about why you receieved them in the first place?

BBW - that's really unacceptable (and cowardly) for anyone to PM anyone a threat. Jah is right and you should report them. If it was me, I would cut and paste the messages onto the forum proper and make the comments public. I'm really sorry - you don't deserve that. I know you say that you're thick skinned but most people would be upset by that.

Giggirl,


I don't recieve regular threats so it's not really an issue. I wont report them or make them public because that shows them that I've been rattled. Beside's they don't know who I am so they couldn't get hold of me even if they wanted to.


I have very thick skin. It's probably the most valuable thing I own. I don't mind people prodding it now and again either, just expect to be prodded back.


That's all.

My final comment on this. Agree with Jah and GG about the PMs, name and shame, as that is very poor, and cowardly form. Aside from that wolf, I just don't think you're quite getting the point Jah is making, there is a world of difference between being cheeky, and some of the stuff you come out with. It's about lines, and respect for people. Anyway, enough, we shall all raise a glass and move on.

initially it can be.... not confusing, more counter-intuitive


I have met people from over 2 years ago, who have become good friends, who struggle to call me by my more common name


On the other hand, with some people it would seem silly to call by their forum name - Bigbadwolf or Administrator for example


The closer to involving a "real" name their online name is the less of a deal it is - I'm guessing your name would be easy enough?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> initially it can be.... not confusing, more

> counter-intuitive

>

> I have met people from over 2 years ago, who have

> become good friends, who struggle to call me by my

> more common name

>

> On the other hand, with some people it would seem

> silly to call by their forum name - Bigbadwolf or

> Administrator for example

>

> The closer to involving a "real" name their online

> name is the less of a deal it is - I'm guessing

> your name would be easy enough?



My real name is Dave but you can call me Sophie if you like ;-)


I see what you mean plus you'd feel a bit of a prat in a pub being called something silly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...