Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

mockney piers Wrote:

I think you may mean literary dexterity, my literal dexterity is terrble these days, can't even touch my toes.


Yes, I think you've got me there Mockney.


and he has done us all up like a kipper with "retopificating"....even Google has never heard of it....:))


Actually, Google is a joke. I come on here to improve my vocabulary, amongst other things, and an esteemed Poster uses a word those clowns at Google have never even encountered!


What does it mean, please, MP?

BBW I didn't mean anyone on here is a net geek. I was talking about the kind of person who spends this life talking about how pathetic various forums are, and yet, invests hour talking about them, and trying to damage them, in order to teach them some sort of lesson, which 4, sure is valid in their sad little geek minds. Thankfully, this forum is quite well guarded against such tools.

There are some forumites whose posts I will never read because I don't like how they post. I will skip anyone who is regularly cruel, rude, aggressive, childish, makes personal attacks etc. I'm probably not alone in that. Conversely, there are some forumites whose threads I follow even though I don't agree with a word they write, but I find their arguments compelling.


If you are going to be cruel or make personal attacks then you do need to accept that that there are forumites you will alienate in the process. Personally, I come on the forum for some light relief, not to be wound up, so I just automatically censor certain forumites by not reading their posts (or the pointless threads they start). I don't mind a good argument - let's face it they can be really amusing. For me, cruelty and rudeness cross a line - there's just no need.

bigbadwolf Wrote:


> I've no intention of speaking to any of you at a

> pub in the way I carry on here. I'd be seperated

> with most of my teeth if I did.


Ahem! That was exactly the point I was trying to put over. Why do you feel the need to be so offensive, obnoxious and rude on here when you wouldn't have the balls to behave in the same way in public if you were to meet any of us. It's exactly that kind of cowardly hiding behind the computer behaviour so gets on my wick. I know I'm not alone in feeling that way. I just don't think there is any need for it when at other times you can be an intelligent and at times witty and erudite contibutor on here.

Jah,


O.K, as I've said to Keef, I won't go round being directly offensive to you in public but I will be cheeky if I can garner a laugh out of it for everyone. Believe it or not, I can do it without hurting other peoples feelings. I'm also (as I've stated many times before) more than happy to poke fun at myself and hope others would too, for the sake of mutual humour, not to make some one feel singled out.


I feel the need to be obnoxious and rude on this site to defend myself against the type of unwarranted aggression I recieve from the likes of you and others. You are consistantly aggresive towards me, even when I'm trying to be either polite or pleasant. Yesterday was a prime example. I was minding my own business and you come along and pick a fight. I wont cower to aggression.


I suppose it's my own fault for making a bit of a name for myself when I first turned up and I've no one else to blame for this.


However,


What a lot of you don't realise is that when I'm percieved to be rude, it's often against someone who's singled me out first. I think that a lot of the resentment against me isn't because I can be rude, but because I have the 'audacity' to stick one back on my all too often, older agitator. If you can't take it, don't give it.


One last thing I don't do that I've been on the recieving end of, is sending messages containing violent intent towards the reciever. I've had these from some regular posters before and just so they know, you don't frighten me.

I've no intention of having another day like yesterday. I don't feel I've been aggressive. If I have it's in response to your rude and obnoxious tone. Like you say "if you can't take it don't dish it out."


If people have sent you violent and threatening personal messages then that is bang out of order and you should report them. But have you thought about why you receieved them in the first place?

BBW - that's really unacceptable (and cowardly) for anyone to PM anyone a threat. Jah is right and you should report them. If it was me, I would cut and paste the messages onto the forum proper and make the comments public. I'm really sorry - you don't deserve that. I know you say that you're thick skinned but most people would be upset by that.

Giggirl,


I don't recieve regular threats so it's not really an issue. I wont report them or make them public because that shows them that I've been rattled. Beside's they don't know who I am so they couldn't get hold of me even if they wanted to.


I have very thick skin. It's probably the most valuable thing I own. I don't mind people prodding it now and again either, just expect to be prodded back.


That's all.

My final comment on this. Agree with Jah and GG about the PMs, name and shame, as that is very poor, and cowardly form. Aside from that wolf, I just don't think you're quite getting the point Jah is making, there is a world of difference between being cheeky, and some of the stuff you come out with. It's about lines, and respect for people. Anyway, enough, we shall all raise a glass and move on.

initially it can be.... not confusing, more counter-intuitive


I have met people from over 2 years ago, who have become good friends, who struggle to call me by my more common name


On the other hand, with some people it would seem silly to call by their forum name - Bigbadwolf or Administrator for example


The closer to involving a "real" name their online name is the less of a deal it is - I'm guessing your name would be easy enough?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> initially it can be.... not confusing, more

> counter-intuitive

>

> I have met people from over 2 years ago, who have

> become good friends, who struggle to call me by my

> more common name

>

> On the other hand, with some people it would seem

> silly to call by their forum name - Bigbadwolf or

> Administrator for example

>

> The closer to involving a "real" name their online

> name is the less of a deal it is - I'm guessing

> your name would be easy enough?



My real name is Dave but you can call me Sophie if you like ;-)


I see what you mean plus you'd feel a bit of a prat in a pub being called something silly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...