Jump to content

Charter School East - consultations


Recommended Posts

Not sure why kids cant walk there? is it really too far?


Wonder if the intake will increase?


Maybe Angelina means the original temp site! I also received an email and understand that the nodal point will still be as originally stated not in Camberwell (which makes sense).


Think this is great news for all the kids that are hoping to go to the new school, much better facilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Angelina and Hoonalonna have received different

> information. Hopefully one of the governor /

> parents active on the forum will see this thread

> and clarify. I imagine there might be two nodal

> points for the first two years but who knows.


No - I'm assuming Angelina meant the 'old' temporary site, i.e. Dulwich Hospital...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds very clear to me from their email that this new site does NOT change their admissions criteria:


'We will, of course, have to contend with a site that is slightly further away from our permanent base. The Southampton Way campus is 1.2 miles from the Dulwich Community Hospital. The Charter Schools Educational Trust recognises that parents and carers will have made applications to TCSED expecting that we would be based on the hospital site as that was the only option available to us at the time applications were made. Our occupation of the temporary site has no impact on our admissions criteria.'


It sounds like buses will definitely be laid on to take them from the ED site.


This is all v encouraging and interesting news - I was really concerned by the previous lack of space for a library, science and art rooms, assembly hall, sports space etc in the original temporary site (for the first two years), but this rather changes things...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no change to the admissions policy - just a change to where the school is going to be for two years - that was the point - isn't that bad enough?


someone suggested the kids could walk it - sorry but they are only 11 years old, its going to be a very long way from some parts of ED

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> no change to the admissions policy - just a change

> to where the school is going to be for two years -

> that was the point - isn't that bad enough?

>

> someone suggested the kids could walk it - sorry

> but they are only 11 years old, its going to be a

> very long way from some parts of ED


This is a non problem if you actually read the Charter site so I don't understand why you wouldn't do that before commenting




"For this reason, the Department of Education will support The Charter Schools Educational Trust in providing travel between the permanent school (or a convenient nearby pickup point) and the entrance to the Southampton Way campus. Exact details are to be confirmed, but we envisage this will involve dedicated transport in the morning, drop-offs in the evening and to and from The Charter School North Dulwich for sporting provision and after-school clubs and societies. This will enable students to experience the independence associated with making their own way to secondary school while easing their journey."

http://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/page/?title=Our+temporary+school+site+at+Southampton+Way&pid=120

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So shuttle buses to and from, public transport and just over a mile away


That said, my son managed to get to Kingsdale which is closer to 3 miles by walking, now cycles..and yes from the age of 11


My daughter manages a public bus to Sydenham Girls ...2 miles away


Part of going to secondary is burgeoning independence which involves getting to places and back ..it is far harder for parents to adjust than children :)


It looks pretty amazing as a temporary site ..well done Charter ED for securing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes - I meant the Dulwich Hosital temporary site. Applications for the year 2016 entry are based on distance (crow flies) to the gate on the temporary site on the Permanent School.


The fact that the children will be based in a substitute site has not bearing on the applications.

The email from the school today says "Our occupation of the temporary site has no impact on our admissions criteria" (this referring to the Southampton Way site).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curmudgeon "That said, my son managed to get to Kingsdale which is closer to 3 miles by walking, now cycles..and yes from the age of 11"


Walking the gauntlet between Camberwell Green / Peckham Road and Southampton Way is not to be confused with a stroll through Dulwich Village imo. Best stick to school designated buses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't 3 miles away


The school / DoE are laying on coaches


It's kind of a moot point


And believe me I wasn't OK about it before the eldest started nor when he first started cycling ...it becomes easier to allow them independence, I was just mentioning that this can be harder on parents than children

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> no change to the admissions policy - just a change

> to where the school is going to be for two years -

> that was the point - isn't that bad enough?

>

>

I don't see this as bad news at all - I think it is excellent news. I'd far rather the kids have decent space and facilities, even if they have to travel a bit further, rather than being on a cramped and noisy building site for two years. Plus it means they can crack on with the building work on the actual site more freely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you fill out a form to choose a school in east Dulwich, its nice when you get your place that you find it to be in east Dulwich.


Other people talking about walks to school - that's all fine, as the school was where it was when you applied for it, it didn't move.


anyway - I'm half expecting my child will not get a place at this school - so maybe won't be our problem.


people stating its a non-issue might find that everyone else may not feel the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough


You haven't lost anything because your application was in addition to the standard application form. The application to the new Charter did not take one of your standard application places.


Yes of course you are entitled to feel how you feel. As are others entitled to feel that any concern is misplaced.


If you do want a place I hope you are successful in getting one. I do appreciate how stressful this process is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree with the coaches, of course its a good idea and keeps the children safe, but successful applicants are now sending our children to a very different place geographically and it takes time out of the childrens day etc - not ideal but I understand a solution had to be found and has been.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is a successful applicant yet - places aren't offered till 1 March. So people have got plenty of time to decide if they want to turn it down if they don't like the idea. As Curmudgeon says, it was an additional choice on top of the standard form this year, so people won't have lost out if they decide they don't want their child to travel at all for those two years. But I would point out that this new temporary site is still much nearer than most of the other 'local' choices, e.g. Kingsdale, Sydenham Girls etc - it's certainly much nearer than five out of the six other choices we had on our list.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Harris East Dulwich Boys Academy bused people from the intended permanent site to Kingswood Estate temporary site for two years it worked well. It meant the permanent site proceeded without having to work around children. So on reflection this is probably a great idea.


The admissions being based on the entrance to the originally proposed temporary school is bizarre but suspect they can;t change their admissions criteria for September 2016 entry. I hope they do for September 2017 using the ultimately planned permanent entrance on the Dulwich Hospital site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's my understanding that the Jarvis Road entrance was chosen as the nodal point for admissions not because it was the entrance to the proposed temporary school but because it's the furthest point from Charter Red Post Hill, thereby reducing any potential overlap of catchment area.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They have. They asked in the original consultation. I’ve talked about it above. Around 3000 people (57% of a self selecting sample), were against the scheme. But the point you seem to be struggling with is that it wasn’t a referendum. We don't routinely have referenda on matters public policy in the UK (Brexit aside). We elect people to make decisions and then we judge the quality of those decisions in the round, and either re-elect them, or kick them out. That’s representative democracy. It’s not a good idea imo, but happy to listen if you do want to make the case for the routine use of referenda in matters of public policy. Not so much if you just want to use it selectively for a single issue you feel strongly about. Still ducking the question I’ve posed to you more than once now on claim of inadequate signage and intimidation of emergency services I note.
    • Sounds like you are running scared of the idea Earl, come now with so much debate over what is a consultation /referendum surly it's a simplel way of settling the argument 🤔 
    • Pot holes feel like they’re becoming more of an issue (based purely on my perception, don’t know what data there is). Even worse outside London imo. I suspect as Mal says, heavier vehicles are part of the problem (both SUVs, but also EVs which are generally heavier than ‘conventional’ cars), but regardless the council need to be more on it.  You can use the fixmystreet app to report them (and other street maintenance issues). 
    • Prior to the LTNs do you have many examples where the results of consultations were not acted upon? Seems to me the council is picking and choosing when they action the feedback from their constituents.......   Have you looked at the results from that, if not, tale some time to have a look, its quite enlightening..it seems the majority do not think the changes will have the desired effect....but you know it's not a refendum so the council has chosen to ignore the feedback of constituents. They must be assuming full responsibility for ignoring residents feedback- clearly they think they know what's best for us. If it all goes wrong let's see if they take responsibility!   Earl, here's a question for you (and i know you wont answer it but lets see)...why do you think the council has never asked a yes/no question to local residents about anything to do with the LTNs - wether they exist or whether we think the changes they have suggested (using our money) are needed/worthwhile? Or a consultation with a yes/no answer but we all know why. I still laugh that the council had to re-run the CPZ consultation with a yes/no answer and finally had to listen to their constituents...they took a hell of a spanking! They have been cheating the system for years and getting away with it. So does that not apply during consultations then? (P.S before you answer take a look at the definition of a consultation as provided by the Local Government Association).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...