Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No problem at all James, and I certainly wasn't criticising - hope it didn't come across like that.


I greatly appreciate all you do for East Dulwich, and I wouldn't normally have chased after such a short time, just that it was time-critical.


Have got your response now, for which thanks.

Hi Sue,

No problem. It was a useful reminder. I get so many emails that sometimes I read it and don't get a chance to reply if more complicated and they can get lost in the deluge.


Hi Zenoria,

I had an email from the developer last week telling me how misguided my objections would be to a restaurant/bar on your street. They even had the cheek to tell me the ED Warehouse failed rather than the owner made a huge rent hike!

James,

Having received, last night, individual letters from your party regarding the council elections can you tell me why not all those at our house received the same letter?


Some had the Libdem spiel about how bad Labour have done *yawns* whilst another had a letter about postal voting advising to register.

To be clear, to avoid any room for misunderstanding - one letter mentions ONLY the need to sign up to postal vote, the other letter is just the normal rubbish sent from one party bad mouthing another. Both letters had a "application to vote by post" form included. All residents at my address are already registered for postal vote with written confirmation from the electoral services.


Your (Libdem) letter is confusing and a potential to raise worry over the matter of registering for postal vote being done correctly and possible fraud - as has already been discussed on the EDF.


This particular letter doesn't look official especially when issued from a party in the run up to an election!

Surely this is not the responsibilty for running parties but Southwark Council!

Hi James


Apologies if this issue has already been raised but I wondered if you would be able to confirm how would we go about getting an additional ticket machine at ED station? There are only two, which may ordinarily be enough, but one of them is regularly out of action. Additionally, the ticket office can't top up an oyster card (which raises the separate query as to whether it is really needed). The frequent result is a long queue for one machine and frustrated commuters missing their trains in the morning.


Your help would be greatly appreciated.


Thanks in advance!

EDLove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Additionally, the ticket

> office can't top up an oyster card (which raises

> the separate query as to whether it is really

> needed).


How absolutely wonderful of you. Lets make more people unemployed.

Why don't you just plan ahead and buy your ticket/top up in advance and then you won't have to suffer such tiresome inconvenience.

Hi KK,

I've Pm'd for more details.


Hi Worldwiser,

A ticket office should be able to provide much more bespoke service. So keen to keep it open and staff keeping an eye locally on our station.

For run of the mill tickets I would suggest topping up Oyster cards over the internet wherever possible to avoid queues.


But both machines should be reliable. The cover on one looks very Heath Robinson and tacky. Let me ask the train operating company.

Today I can announce that the secondary school provider we've decide to go with is Haberdashers' Aske's Federation and to model our new East Dulwich secondary school on their Hatcham College (minus the primary school part). Great news for our area.


Sadly The Charter School who we didn't choose to go with have launched what appears a spoiling campaign.

Definitely agree there should be staff on the platforms and out and about. But having them behind an old-fashioned ticket office counter is of precious little use to 99.9% of travellers. They should carry a portable machine to deal with ticket/Oyster queries.
Hi James, could you possibly speak to the train company re: Denmark Hill having an extra ticket machine, it's even busier than ED, so having only one really isn't viable. If people could update Oyster cards at the ticket office this would also help, are you aware of any plans for this to happen?
Oyster is a system that was designed to eliminate human interaction. I would think on a point of principle they would not take this step. You can top up online and also set an auto top-up at a level of your choosing. Everyone should do this - I haven't had to visit a machine or ticket office in years. Queuing to top up an Oyster would be a woeful misuse of the operative's time.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

You can

> top up online and also set an auto top-up at a

> level of your choosing. Everyone should do this -

> I haven't had to visit a machine or ticket office

> in years.


xxxxxxx


Even if someone doesn't have internet access themselves, presumably they could ask someone who does to set the auto top-up for them - or go to an internet cafe or the library, if they know how to use the internet.


I did auto top-up in the days before my freedom pass. It was very easy and meant I never had to worry at all about the Oyster card running out.


But I agree if you are travelling beyond the Oyster zone you do still need to use a ticket office, at least until such time as they change the system - I don't think you can get the add-on ticket at a machine, can you?

Well I did suggest the staff should carry a portable machine like they do on national rail. People without access to internet are an infinitesimally small constituency. Those that do have it should not be queuing up for this kind of thing.

Hi Sue,

not everyone can afford auto top-up. They need to manage their finances much more closely. So yes for many people auto top-up is god send but for others it could cause terrible problems with their finances.


Hi WW,

Yes, you did. And no reason why they couldn't do this. It would seem during quieter times a more sensible use of their time.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Sue,

> not everyone can afford auto top-up. They need to

> manage their finances much more closely. So yes

> for many people auto top-up is god send but for

> others it could cause terrible problems with their

> finances.

>


xxxxxx


Yes, that's true, and come to think of it I do know people who top up a tiny bit at a time for exactly that reason, so I take it back.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi WW,

> We're not all same. Not everyone has internet

> access.


Please please remember this JB when you do your testing of ED opinion concerning your plans that are already well under way!

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> EDLove Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> Additionally, the ticket

> > office can't top up an oyster card (which

> raises

> > the separate query as to whether it is really

> > needed).

>

> How absolutely wonderful of you. Lets make more

> people unemployed.

> Why don't you just plan ahead and buy your

> ticket/top up in advance and then you won't have

> to suffer such tiresome inconvenience.


Haha! You're absolutely right unlurked. It makes complete sense to carry on employing people, even if they have very little to do...


I have nothing against employing people in the ticket-office if they are providing a service that is needed.


The train companies have provided (presumably with the money generated from our steep train fares) machines to enable people to top up their oyster cards. Just because they have also provided an online system - which not everyone can access or wishes to access - does not mean that it is acceptable for one of these machines (which is the preferred option for many) to be out of order on a regular basis.


Even those who can access the online system will, on occasion, not realise how much is left on their oyster or not top up before coming to ED station because, of course, there are two machines (but never a ticket-office employee) there to help with this...


If commuters are precluded from voicing frustration at the fact certain services/machines do not work, then where does it stop? Should others be banned from venting at the fact a train is delayed or a bus route only has one bus per hour? Afterall, there are alternatives to both of these too.


James, thank you for your help here. Much appreciated. :)

James thoughts on the amount of rubbish pilled up from lordship lanes business's on the footpaths in the evenings?


I bring this up as summer is on the way (fingers crossed) a lot of the restaurants and bars on the lane are setting up tables on the street which is great, but with piles of empty food boxes and rubbish it's not so nice and the lane could be a lot better without the refuse.



Do you think it be a good idea if the council provided large bins for the commercial rubbish say around the side streets away from residential houses, or better still organised a rubbish run for the lane between 6pm and 7pm with all other commercial rubbish found a warning issued ?? perhaps a bit draconian thoughts ?


Perhaps yourself and or the Councillors could advise if there is anything afoot to look into this already?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...