Jump to content

Recommended Posts

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well we all have our views don't we hellosailor ?

> I think it's inflamatory and aggresive to use

> words like "jeering " .

>


You think it's inflammatory and aggressive to use the word 'jeering'?

I'm genuinely perplexed.

Perhaps you know a different definition from me?

I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start a thread about a private message, naming the person who sent it and publishing the content or alluding to what it was about.


If you're prepared to post on a public forum, and be quite antagonistic with it, then you can reasonably expect to receive a response on the forum or by PM.


I don't read the family room posts but from what I've seen of Londonmix on other parts of the forum comes across as a reasonable, fair and interesting poster whose contributions are worth reading. Increasingly rare qualities these days, in my opinion. LM has already politely explained their use of the word jerk and why they PMd rather than derailed the thread so no need to go on about other ridiculous things it could have meant. I'd be horrified if someone started a thread about a PM I'd sent. It's unnecessary and unpleasant behaviour.


If you're being "cyber-bullied" or receiving offensive, abusive PMs then that's another matter entirely. Nothing to see here tho.

Bit rich coming from die hard clique needy


numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start a

> thread about a private message, naming the person

> who sent it and publishing the content or alluding

> to what it was about.

>

> If you're prepared to post on a public forum, and

> be quite antagonistic with it, then you can

> reasonably expect to receive a response on the

> forum or by PM.

>

> I don't read the family room posts but from what

> I've seen of Londonmix on other parts of the forum

> comes across as a reasonable, fair and interesting

> poster whose contributions are worth reading.

> Increasingly rare qualities these days, in my

> opinion. LM has already politely explained their

> use of the word jerk and why they PMd rather than

> derailed the thread so no need to go on about

> other ridiculous things it could have meant. I'd

> be horrified if someone started a thread about a

> PM I'd sent. It's unnecessary and unpleasant

> behaviour.

>

> If you're being "cyber-bullied" or receiving

> offensive, abusive PMs then that's another matter

> entirely. Nothing to see here tho.

gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah yes, you must all stick together on this. Some

> self-reflection would be far too upsetting!

> In my original post, I was commenting on the type

> of language some people were using - you know -

> 'first world problems'. I wasn't criticising

> anyone needing advice or sharing tips!

> I certainly don't think that it justifies being

> called a 'jerk' in a private message. Would you

> have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? You should take your own advice.

> However, I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


Oh god blimey, wipe your mouth of it all


And offering to meet someone to 'have it out' is idiotic


Being called a jerk in a pm is pretty polite given the above


I'm thinking something stronger here

I hear the latest grand theft auto is centered around a fictional East Dulwich. Where nothing really happens except people abuse each other with childish names in drive by shoutings and message boards. Then bleat about a tree being damaged for the rest of the game.

gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Would you have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? You should take your own advice.

> However, I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


If you do decide to have it out in person i would be happy to referee if you could make it a Friday morning as I'm turfed out of my flat by the cleaner #firstworldproblems

dogcatdog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hear the latest grand theft auto is centered

> around a fictional East Dulwich. Where nothing

> really happens except people abuse each other with

> childish names in drive by shoutings and message

> boards. Then bleat about a tree being damaged for

> the rest of the game.


drive by shoutings :)

I just sent myself a PM calling myself a gentrifier. I've reported myself to the mods, the police and the rockers.


gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would you have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


lol


This is probably the least risky forum in the world to act like an internet tough guy and ask people if they "want some". What are you going to do, throw their latte over their labradoodle? "Jerk" sounds like an okay description.

Not as rich as a 'newbie' writing that. Unless of course you aren't. In which case who were you before?


Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bit rich coming from die hard clique needy

>

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start

> a

> > thread about a private message, naming the

> person

> > who sent it and publishing the content or

> alluding

> > to what it was about.

> >

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...