Jump to content

Londonmix sent me a private message to call me a 'jerk'

gillandjoe

By gillandjoe
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

hellosailor

hellosailor

Posted
Posted

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well we all have our views don't we hellosailor ?

> I think it's inflamatory and aggresive to use

> words like "jeering " .

>


You think it's inflammatory and aggressive to use the word 'jeering'?

I'm genuinely perplexed.

Perhaps you know a different definition from me?

numbers

numbers

Posted
Posted

I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start a thread about a private message, naming the person who sent it and publishing the content or alluding to what it was about.


If you're prepared to post on a public forum, and be quite antagonistic with it, then you can reasonably expect to receive a response on the forum or by PM.


I don't read the family room posts but from what I've seen of Londonmix on other parts of the forum comes across as a reasonable, fair and interesting poster whose contributions are worth reading. Increasingly rare qualities these days, in my opinion. LM has already politely explained their use of the word jerk and why they PMd rather than derailed the thread so no need to go on about other ridiculous things it could have meant. I'd be horrified if someone started a thread about a PM I'd sent. It's unnecessary and unpleasant behaviour.


If you're being "cyber-bullied" or receiving offensive, abusive PMs then that's another matter entirely. Nothing to see here tho.

Grok

Grok

Posted
Posted

Bit rich coming from die hard clique needy


numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start a

> thread about a private message, naming the person

> who sent it and publishing the content or alluding

> to what it was about.

>

> If you're prepared to post on a public forum, and

> be quite antagonistic with it, then you can

> reasonably expect to receive a response on the

> forum or by PM.

>

> I don't read the family room posts but from what

> I've seen of Londonmix on other parts of the forum

> comes across as a reasonable, fair and interesting

> poster whose contributions are worth reading.

> Increasingly rare qualities these days, in my

> opinion. LM has already politely explained their

> use of the word jerk and why they PMd rather than

> derailed the thread so no need to go on about

> other ridiculous things it could have meant. I'd

> be horrified if someone started a thread about a

> PM I'd sent. It's unnecessary and unpleasant

> behaviour.

>

> If you're being "cyber-bullied" or receiving

> offensive, abusive PMs then that's another matter

> entirely. Nothing to see here tho.

Seabag

Seabag

Posted
Posted

gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah yes, you must all stick together on this. Some

> self-reflection would be far too upsetting!

> In my original post, I was commenting on the type

> of language some people were using - you know -

> 'first world problems'. I wasn't criticising

> anyone needing advice or sharing tips!

> I certainly don't think that it justifies being

> called a 'jerk' in a private message. Would you

> have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? You should take your own advice.

> However, I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


Oh god blimey, wipe your mouth of it all


And offering to meet someone to 'have it out' is idiotic


Being called a jerk in a pm is pretty polite given the above


I'm thinking something stronger here

dogcatdog

dogcatdog

Posted
Posted
I hear the latest grand theft auto is centered around a fictional East Dulwich. Where nothing really happens except people abuse each other with childish names in drive by shoutings and message boards. Then bleat about a tree being damaged for the rest of the game.
Northeastview

Northeastview

Posted
Posted

gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Would you have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? You should take your own advice.

> However, I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


If you do decide to have it out in person i would be happy to referee if you could make it a Friday morning as I'm turfed out of my flat by the cleaner #firstworldproblems

JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

dogcatdog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hear the latest grand theft auto is centered

> around a fictional East Dulwich. Where nothing

> really happens except people abuse each other with

> childish names in drive by shoutings and message

> boards. Then bleat about a tree being damaged for

> the rest of the game.


drive by shoutings :)

rabbitears

rabbitears

Posted
Posted

I just sent myself a PM calling myself a gentrifier. I've reported myself to the mods, the police and the rockers.


gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would you have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


lol


This is probably the least risky forum in the world to act like an internet tough guy and ask people if they "want some". What are you going to do, throw their latte over their labradoodle? "Jerk" sounds like an okay description.

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

Not as rich as a 'newbie' writing that. Unless of course you aren't. In which case who were you before?


Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bit rich coming from die hard clique needy

>

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start

> a

> > thread about a private message, naming the

> person

> > who sent it and publishing the content or

> alluding

> > to what it was about.

> >

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By Sue · Posted

      As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Sue
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By Sue · Posted

      Duplicated post
    • Ellie90
      Moving Boxes (Large + Medium) needed 📦

      By Ellie90 · Posted

      Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • sidebirdz
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By sidebirdz · Posted

      bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...