Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nigee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The truth is a lemon meringue??


It is wrote 'Blessed are the pastry chefs, for they shall ensure there is no spot of grease in the bowl before beating the egg whites. They shall create the lemon meringue in perfection, but the Lord will keepeth an eye on them so that the sin of being flash does not enter their hearts. The pastry chefs will be as ants that toil with an arse-full of formic acid and will take the ant's humility when they serveth the meringue to their richers and betters. Deeply humile shall they be.

The punters upon receiving the meringue, will sniff of it's fine fragrance and compliment its presentation.

Then turn to the idlers, tax collectors and fornicators, with whom they feel their chances are half and bare heedless of the meringue (truth, still with me?) they break the crust, toy with it, dip their middle finger in the sauce and thoughtfully take suck of it.

But cosumeth any round the table of the entire truth? Sorry, meringue. I say unto thee, nay not even one in ten.

It fair maketh one spit, doeth it not?

And the moral is, when Jesus spent forty days and forty nights in the dessert, this is what he was getting at'


Edited to remove a spurious 'any'. I blameth being distracted by the idlers and tax collectors.

Not perhaps as some might think, the fornicators, I've always found them to be kindness itself.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We seem to have someone who likes to post daft

> messages on the forum under different user names

> at the moment. If you see something

> out-of-the-ordinarily stupid please report it.


That could take all day...we've work to do

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I seem to have lost my muse and can only

> communicate effectively thought the medium of

> imbedded images at the moment.


She's around here somewhere (but tends to sulk if you spell her name wrong!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...