Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why on earth have the rest of boyzone flown out to Spain? What use will they be there? I could understand if the funeral was going to be held there, or if that is where Stephen and his family lived but he'd only been in the country for a few hours with his partner. Does anyone else think they're doing it solely for the media?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> iaineasy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I reckon it sounds like a GHB overdose,

>

> My money's on G too.



Based on what, exactly?


I mean, assuming that we're happily throwing away the concept of respect for the dead and debating the cause of death of a young man about whom we know virtually nothing, where's this coming from?


Or, as I suspect, are you just working with the equation of stereotyping that young + gay + sudden death = club drugs?


I'm not saying that it's absolutely definitely not, by the by, because I don't know: the point is that there isn't really anything being put out there at this time that points in that direction clearly enough for such definite sounding statements of what is or is not likely.

It's speculative. It's a guess. It's idle gossip. However..



I've taken G, so I am fully aware of its effects (good and bad, obviously)


It is popular with gay men.


It is popular for it to be taken on holiday - where other drugs can't be taken - because it's not illegal and slips through customs in a innocuous shampoo bottle.


It is popular for it to be taken on holiday by gay men.


It does not mix with alcohol.


G + Alcohol = fall asleep and not wake up.


It disappears from the bloodstream rapidly, so there would be no suspicious circumstances, and cause of death would not be immediately apparent.



So my wild, speculative guess, is that they went out drinking, met some dude in a bar, went back to their pad to party, ended-up taking some G (either his or theirs) and Stephen fell into a coma.

As someone who used to work in the closest Emergency Department to Vauxhall I am also extremely familiar with the effects of GHB and GBL (both of which are, by the way, illegal *Bob*) and it's popularity on the clubbing scene, particularly amongst gay men (six consecutive LAS priority calls into the resuscitation room is my record for a Sunday afternoon on-duty)

And, yes, when a young man dies unexpectedly drugs are certainly a possiblity.


What I find distasteful is the speculation and, hand in hand with that, the implied judgement.


A young man is dead, long before his time, that is tragic for his family and friends and is just as tragic however it happened.

Pretty much everyone on here has expressed some sort of condolence for his death so I don't think anyone is being mean-spirited


If any 33 year old dies suddenly and with no obvious cause then it's perfectly natural for people to speculate. I'm not sure there is much judgement going on either


I wouldn't speculate under the families noses, but given that we are talking about him (and if he is someone we don't know why are we even doing that) it seems reasonable to try and piece things together

Anna: GBL is not illegal.. not yet. (below from government 'Frank' website). Maybe by the end of the year.


GBL.. is a legal product used in industry and probably available from other sources such as the internet. However, The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) which advises the government, has provisionally recommended that GBL should also be controlled as a Class C drug with consultation on a licensing arrangement for its use in industry.


As for speculation (on my part anyway), judgement doesn't come into it. (Pot / kettle / black)


It's just speculation. I'm sure his family, friends and the police will all be doing the same thing and have more important things to think about than reading speculative postings on here, or any of the other thousand places up and down the land.

If there's no element of judgement to the speculation why are drugs, and specifically club drugs popular with the gay community, the only possibility anyone is talking about?


What about the possiblity that he slipped on spilt milk and gave himself a fatal head injury, or put a knife into the toaster and electrocuted himself, or had an underlying heart condition that no-one knew about, or, well, any number of possibilites that aren't as gossip worthy. Sorry, but Ian and *Bob*'s posts didn't read to me as reasonably trying to piece things together, they read like gossip at the expense of a dead man and I found that a bit distasteful.

I honestly hope it isn't anything to do with G.


Because it it is, it'll ram all the tabloids with stories about G, the evil 'gay drug' - and then you'll see some real 'judgement' for sure.



However, I think we can safely rule-out the toast/electrocution and slipping on milk scenario.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> probabilty v possibility?


A much debated premise in many circumstances, from risk assessment to racial profiling. But the point I was trying to make is that it's fairly unnecessary to trample on a man's grave in the name of demographics.

I don't agree with your definition of 'respect', dbboy.


It's an internet thread about someone famous - in showbusiness - who has died in mysterious circumstances. What do you expect.. two minute's silence? Seriously?



In any case, there's no point gossiping about something after the truth is established.

  Quote
It's an internet thread about someone famous - in showbusiness - who has died in mysterious circumstances


In a case in which the Police announced on the same day that they were not treating his death as suspicious - did they also need to say that it wasn't mysterious? Which other adjectives do you need covering?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 info@jkec.net Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
    • The contact email for the Major Works Team: majorworks@southwark.gov.uk
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...