Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm interested in hearing their squabbles.


This is supposed to be politics, not some warm fuzzy giant PTA meeting where everyone drinks tea, eats digestives, listens sympathetically with cocked head to other points of view and then finished with a group hug.


I want petty squabbling, backstabbing, smear and lies. I want it here, and a I want it now.

To clarify - the position is set out in the email I sent to Toast which was posted at 7.19pm yesterday.


The government has provided more than ?12 million to Southwark in extra funding. This is for capital works required to build accommodation for extra school places. It is specifically to support the provision of additional places "by 2011" and is on top of the ?50.5 million already allocated to Southwark by the government for capital spending on schools for the period 2008/11.


How this extra money is spent is a decision for the local authority which, in this case, has shown itself to be behind the game and certainly in a poor position of planning for new school places compared to Lambeth - part of which I also represent.


The ?12 million extra is a substantial funding settlement making a total of ?62.6 million for Southwark over three years. The Schools Minister, in his letter to me on Monday, made it clear that the money must be spent by 2011.


I would encourage anyone with an interest in this matter to approach their councillors and council candidates to seek their views on where they stand on this issue and why Southwark handled the concerns of local parents so badly earlier this year.


For information, I have attached a copy of the letter I sent to Ed Balls in August of this year putting the case for extra funding. I have had two meetings with the Schools Minister, Vernon Coaker, to press the issue since that letter was sent.


Tessa Jowell MP

TJMP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Following a campaign by local parents and myself

> and after two meetings I have had with the Schools

> Minister, Vernon Coaker, I am pleased to be able

> to report that Southwark has been allocated an

> extra ?12 million by the government towards the

> capital funding needed for new school places in

> the East Dulwich area.

>

> Tessa Jowell MP


Well done indeed Tessa Jowell. A substantial sum of money - all the more welcome in these straitened financial times. And good to see you working so effectively with local parents. And for engaging directly with the EDF and the vocal section of the local community that it represents!

TJ


So we are clear on this


>This is for capital works required to build accommodation for extra school places. It is specifically to support the provision of additional places "by 2011" and is on top of the ?50.5 million already allocated to SouthwarkHow this extra money is spent is a decision for the local authority which, in this case, has shown itself to be behind the game and certainly in a poor position of planning for new school places compared to Lambeth - part of which I also represent.<


So Southwark are rubbish at the job but there's ?12 million more in their kitty to spend at will by 2011


Also with this money, what assurance are we to get that the rapid spend programme that Southwark will now undertake is properly audited ? We have seen the collusion recently between Major contractors when bidding on these type of large projects, what are you doing to make sure we get value for money ?


Spending it is the easy bit, making sure it is done well is another. As you said yourself of Southwark "itself to be behind the game and certainly in a poor position of planning "


2011 is not far away, Southwark are poor planners. Doesn't fill the heart with joy does it.



W**F

I agree with Toast!


toast Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Nick is saying nothing about the crass nature of

> the admissions policy which leaves people either

> their nearest school or the ones no one else wants

> far away. Learn a lesson from Lewisham (and

> goodness knows how many other boroughs) or you

> will have a lot of the same problems this year!

> There is extra money, schools welcoming the extra

> funding, everyone is doing their bit but poor

> policy had a large role to play in the upset last

> year and needs fixing!

So it seems Tessa Jowell supported Nick Stantons application ( see PDF) I imagine this is how things should work. the council knows it needs omse more money to increase schools places. The council apllies to central government who control the funds. Tessa supports the application.


I don't think for a minute that she wouldn't support it. Why wouldn't anyone assoicated with the borough not support it? If the leader of the council in any borough asks for more money for schools it would be a sucidial Local MP who wouldn't support it


Well done council for getting the money, thankyou Tessa for helping.


Lets spend it to get the biggest benefit we can

Re Policy


The most fabulous Fiona Colley says


"The scrutiny report has now been presented to the executive and they agreed to ask the Admissions Forum".


The Scrutiny did highlight the problem of policy and recomended looking at the Lewisham clause to help out those out in the sticks. Not sure how much Influence they can have if the council dig their heals in so as not to lose face! Also might not be in time for our lot! Fingers crossed!

Smiler Wrote:

> It would be good to know whether the additional funding is for capital (buildings, portacabins, equipment, IT etc.) only, or whether it can also be used to pay salaries of teaching and support staff.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


The answer to this is in my post above (here) - the extra money is entirely for capital funding and is earmarked for expanding primary school places. It is in addition to the ?50.5 million in capital funding made available to Southwark for the period 2008-2011.


Tessa Jowell MP

I can't help but think, Ms Jowell, that what should have been a triumphant announcement has rather been squashed and deflated. Do you think perhaps that this is because of people's cynicism about the motives of politicians?

If you did genuinely put in a lot of work to get this funding then "Well done!". If however, it was Nick Stanton's work that you are coat-tailing on then the cynicism is well placed. I suppose it will never be clear who should take the credit.


Nonetheless, regardless of who gets the credit, it does sound like a very good thing that in these days of tight budgets that south Southwark should be getting an extra chunk of change to fund additional primary school places (particularly since we've just had a baby and would quite like him to go to a decent primary school in ED without a fight for places in 5 years time).


Thank you for letting us know about this funding increase.

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm a little concerned at the randomness of the funding allocations.

Southwark had 2.5 bulge classes this year. 1 in north Southwark 1.5 in Dulwich area. We get ?12m for more school places.

Lewisham and Lambeth had 6 bulge classes each and respectively get zilch and ?9m.


Next Friday 18th I'll be meeting the executive member of Southwark's education and officers to try understanding all this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...