Jump to content

Recommended Posts

for those out there saying "whats the problem, switch to another company" etc... NO. I am paying for a specific service and it should come as advertised...


Plus unfortunately the only company that can provide you with proper connection speeds is Virgin media so far. Switching over to another company solves nothing, but creates more trouble.

Virgin called me today after I emailed them at [email protected] complaining.. they said they are aware of the issues in the area but due to the complexity of multiple issues they are dealing with it on a case by case basis .. I was given projected fix date of May & given ?50 quid credited back to my account based on ?10 refund per month for poor performance from Jan till then... was also told if wanted to leave them to go elsewhere they would allow freedom from any contractual obligation ...
  • 2 weeks later...

So it would seem, at least in the SE24 area, that the problem is fixed. Over a week now of actually getting 50MB speed in the evening after months of less than 2MB. Fingers crossed it continues.


And BTW, if BT say they can do fibre to your house than Plusnet can too. And for much cheaper.

  • 2 weeks later...
I have been having problems with VM for months - SE24. They told me last week (after saying December then March) that the problem would be fixed at the start of July! I have the XXL package which is a joke and manage to get the odd ?10 refund...

105mbps 3 days ago, today 2mbps - that's the Virgin Media experience for you...




For 9:00am on a Saturday morning that's pretty shoddy.


Down from faster than 80% of the UK, to 65% slower than rest of the UK.


Still, only one month until Virgin's review date of the 18/05/2016 - and then everything will fine - right?


Rob

Dimples, just give VM notice and tell them THEY'RE in breach of contract since they're not providing a reliable service. We threw in the towel a couple of months ago mid contract. Raise the matter with the CEO office who will ensure you don't serve notice. [email protected]. They're well aware that they're unable to provide the service in the area they're charging for pending the "upgrade" they need to do. If it makes you feel more comfortable, run regular speed checks and keep a log. They won't argue.

Yup, 18th of May is the date they're banding around, but not for a fix, but a review.


This means they'll decide whether it's worth fixing (i.e. benefits vs costs to Virgin Media - not a customer-centric decision).


There's been 4 or 5 of these review dates set in the past, with new dates set each time.


So don't get your hopes up.


Personally i'm probably going to bail after this one if they just set a new review date.


Rob

Hi Mick Mack. I think of the main broadband providers you either have cable (Virgin are the only option locally) or ADSL (all the rest using BT infrastructure). However, whilst its technically not necessary to have a landline with Virgin, they bundle this with their TV and broadband in such a way that its more expensive not to have it! End result all the providers are roughly the same price for TV+Phone+Broadband give or take a few pounds and new customer incentives. The Culture Secretary recently proposed scrapping of line rental for households not making fixed line calls and encouraged the main broadband providers to come up with alternative charging models. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35869222
  • 3 months later...
Yes, they told me a few months ago a reparenting allowing a capacity upgrade would take place in August and they assured me this would make the service more reliable. We wait to find how true this latter will prove to be.
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The original post was about one shoplifter. Nobody is suggesting that  the shoplifter wasn't totally in the wrong, or that there may be issues with what shop staff and  security guards can or can't do in this and similar situations. However a description of a woman which includes only skin colour and perceived age is problematic in my view.
    • Looking for a loveseat in good condition. Please get in touch if you’re selling one. Thank you!
    • Why jump on the OP more than the shoplifter?  It is pretty crap to just walk in to a shop and blatantly steal stuff and it does seem to be happening more often which is depressing.  I've witnessed it several times in the last couple of years sometimes with groups of shoplifters who rush in and quickly steal a whole load of stuff.  It does seem to me to be becoming more common.  It's particularly galling when it's stealing non essential stuff like beer unless the person is an alcoholic and not being done because of poverty and hunger. All it does is put the prices up for those that pay and encourage others to just take stuff too.  I guess the OP just wanted to share their anger.  Not sure what a lone security guard can do which is also depressing because if there's no consequence for thieves then such behaviour will inevitably increase. ☹️
    • That description could apply to many people. Why have you said what her skin colour was but not what she was wearing? What do you think will be achieved by posting this on here? If you think the security man should have stopped her, would it not be more constructive to complain to the Co-op? And what has one shoplifter got to do with "the state of this country"? There have always been thieves.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...