Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ARCHITECTS CONSULTATION - April 1st



Meetings will be held on Tuesday 1st April, day and evening. You will need to respond by Friday lunchtime if you want to attend. From previous experience, even if you can't make Tuesday but would like to go, do let them know and they might organise another date if there is sufficient interest.


Please email [email protected] to book a slot - they will be held at the girls school and its by appointment only.


OK - so Harris continue to hide behind the architects and wont speak to local parents and residents directly. (So much for their 'working with parents' slogan [did you know they cut parent governors from 6 down to 1 when they took over the girls school?]), At least you get to see the school and quiz the architects.

2 things - I did not comment on the way the building is designed.


Secondly, you last comment is awful and shows disrespect to many people with this difficult issue. I do not know you or your family so cannot comment on your situation. Dyspraxia has such a wide range of symptons from problems only with some fine motor skills (very common with dyslexics) to more marked motor or neurological issues.


They often go togeher as dyslexics often have dyspraxic issues (of varying degrees). I did not mean to imply that they always go together.


A sports academy may be the right place to some young people with dyspraxis - it will not suit everyone.


What would you rather the Harris academy specialise in? I think in the current climate, sport is a good specialism.


As far as where they do their sport - it really does not matter even Haberdasher Askes Knights Academy don't have grounds on site (neither do Askes at New Cross). We often had to travel to play sport in my day!



Emily Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually, it is not at all true to say that

> 'dyslexia and dyspraxia go together', implying

> they are always present together. My son has

> dyspraxia but not dyslexia. As you say yourself,

> your daughter was not referred for dyslexia. Just

> as I said. She was referred for another condition

> altogether.

> The building is still crap, and unfit for purpose

> regardless. Unless you think that stairs are a

> good way for kids in wheelchairs to get to the

> lower level of the building, where the OT

> department is housed.

> Sunshine House shows that Southwark Council is

> incompetent when it comes to creating new

> buildings.

> And let's face it, a school that claims to be

> first and foremost a sports Academy is no place

> for children with dyspraxia. Especially if they

> are half-way bright.

> It would be a cruel joke on our part to send our

> clever, dyspraxic son to such a place.

zephyr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What would you rather the Harris academy

> specialise in? I think in the current climate,

> sport is a good specialism.



I think sports is an appalling specialism when there is already a girl's school with supposed great sports facilities (although as they don't even have a swimming pool that is an odd statement). Surely the boys school could benefit from these 'facilities' and bring something new to the offering for the boys and girls of Harris Academies to share and benefit from.


I would actually prefer any other specialism at all: technology or arts or music or enterprise or, dare I suggest Science, Mathematics or Languages

  • 7 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I noticed this morning that the 'girls' and 'boys' entrance lintels from the original school have been placed as benches by the pond in Peckham Rye.


A shame that the entrances weren't preserved for the new school, but quite a charming use of a bit of local history. Let's hope the vandals don't get them.


Edited after a walk on the far side of the Rye - it's not those gates, they are still in place.


A mystery now, where did the 'benches' come from?

  • 1 year later...
There was concern a couple of years ago about the numbers of pupils who are eventually to go there and it was nickamed the "sardine academy". It will not reach its capacity for a few more years and with no playground, sports activities for this sports specialist academy will be done on the park.
There is a playround which I can see from Bedroom. A very nice Gym which we saw the other week. Some sports activities will be done off-site but not in the park. Also the Sardine Academy didnt really take off as a nickname apart from that pretty accurate post.

MichaelDavern Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It will not reach its capacity for a few more years and

> with no playground, sports activities for this

> sports specialist academy will be done on the

> park.


As I've said before, it will be over the Head's dead body for any Harris Boy to set foot in the park even at hometime. They do their PE at SouthBank, swimming at the pulse, and cycling at Herne Hill. They do 5 hourse PE a week, compared to the two hours most schools do. It's not always what you have it's what you do with it. I visited a school recently with a beautiful playing field but the kids told me that never have the time to use it.

I'm not saying it's right, but judging from past comments on this forum from people anxious over the boys use of the park it's probably a sensible decision to prevent local resident uproar, lol.


They have to go home and change out of uniform if they want to use their local facilities. They are not allowed in shops in uniform, either.

Hey E-Dealer. This playground you keep reminding us that you can see from yr house. You still truely believe its an adequate size for 700 teenage boys ? Personally i think that's utter nonsense.


School looks great - just too many boys on one site (esp with the park issue as well).

  • 2 weeks later...

Ofcourse they wont all use the playground at the same time derr!


Good News From Harris!


SOUTHWARK footballer Afolabi Coker followed in the footsteps of Rio Ferdinand, Ledley King and Ashley Cole by starring at the Balfour Beatty London Youth Games.


Coker, who like Ferdinand hails from Peckham, captained Southwark to victory as they overcame Brent in the five-a-side football final.


The Harris Academy schoolboy, fourteen, impressed as Southwark scored fifteen goals throughout the tournament, conceding only three in the process, and Coker was quick to hail the team effort.

I am sorry if I am coming in on a tangent here, but whether residents like it or not (and I only live 5 minutes away from this new academy), the area definitely needs a new boys state secondary school. I used to be a teacher at one of the Harris Academies, and it was quite the vilest place I have ever worked (as a teacher). I won't go into the ins and outs of how I feel about the mixing business principles with education and staff disquiet etc etc. but despite very high staff turnover rates, and promoting people at a very young age in order to retain them, the academies DO raise standards. Dramatically in some cases. These academies tend to have high percentages of children from disadvantaged backgrounds, and as has been said, before they were academies they tended to be sink schools. Results and performance have been raised in almost all the schools since they became academies. I think the ED Girls Academy when it was Waverley had something like 30% pass rate at GCSE and it is now over 50%. No mean feat when one considers that the intake is pretty much the same as it was then.


There are too many private schools in the area, and not enough decent state schools. Although I did not enjoy being a teacher at one of the Harris Academies, I would consider sending my children to one, as the results and behavious management were excellent - even if the staff retention was not!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...