Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Recently I was ticketed for parking in a loading bay in ED. Three hours later I saw the guy who gave me the parking ticket parked in the same loading bay while he ticketed someone else on a yellow line. On other occasions I've seen Southwark parking wardens (now called Civilian Enforcement Officers) parking across disabled ramps on pavements and on double yellow lines on dangerous corners.


The behaviour of these individuals is hypocritical, sets a poor example to the community and in some of the cases described, blocks the way for people in wheelchairs or with pushchairs, and adds to the dangers of certain road layouts.


Can everyone who sees a Southwark Civilian Enforcement Officer (on a bike or in a dark red car) parked somewhere that we, the public, would be ticketed for, please photograph the offending vehicle and complain to the council to try to stamp out this appalling behaviour.


This issue has already been raised to the managers in charge of parking at Southwark Council but they have taken the line that 'they are allowed to so they will' quoting the 1984 Traffic Management Act as their right for their staff to park where they want no matter how dangerous or hypocritical.


The manager in charge of parking at Southwark Council is called Nick Costin and I'm sure he'd be delighted to hear from you. I'm not sure that I'd be allowed to give out his email address on this post but if anyone wants to PM me, I'd be happy to pass it on.

The other day I saw two of them giving some guy loading a van up some grief because he was parked half on a yellow line near a street corner, but he was not obstructing traffic, meanwhile they had parked their car over a dropped curb and driveway to a block of flats. Wished I had the time to stop and take a photo and ask them what the deal was.

Declan - you are right, they say they are allowed to break the law to enforce it on other people.


The problem I have with the way they use this 'right' is that I'm not sure that it was intended so that they can do what they want, when they want, with impunity (including parking in dangerous places). I would imagine that the council would prefer that people saw their staff as part of the community not some group who annoys everyone else more than they need to with their 'I'm above the law' attitude.


As with every right, there is a responsibility to exercise that right appropriately.

A while back I complained to the council following an incident where my mother in law (OAP) was harassed by a warden whilst sitting in her car as I jumped out to post a letter in a post box just around the corner. Admittedly she was in a resident's bay without a badge, but it wasn't a red route and was a no through road with plenty of space to park in. To cut a very long story short I returned to the car to find a tearful mother in law saying she had been given a parking ticket despite having offered to move immediately but that she hadn't been handed a piece of paper. I could still see him so jogged down the road to clear up what had happened. All I asked him to do was walk 50 feet back to the car to explain that she hadn't been ticketed, as she was upset. What followed was a tirade of verbal abuse and threats of physical violence as he 'didn't eff-ing have the eff-ing time to talk to some old lady when he hadn't given her an eff-ing ticket - and anyway, what was my eff-ing problem'. After I pointed out that he needed to calm down and all I had done was politely ask him to clarify what had happened he went absolutely ballistic - so I told him I would be reporting him to the council and walked away having taken his ID number from his shoulder. He followed me back to the car, leant through the window of the car and screamed at both of us (this time with hand gestures!). We had to drive off with him practically hanging through the window.


I complained to the council (copying MP) stating his number, exactly what had happened and where and all I got was a standard reply saying that they had no reason to believe that he was nothing other than an exemplary employee as no-one had ever complained about him. I saw him a few weeks later screaming at someone else.


It seems that breaking the law to enforce stretches to more than just parking 'illegally'.

Well, see if any of you can beat this!


My neighbour...a very hard-working polish man (with not too brilliant English...but he's learning fast)...received a parking ticket a while ago while out at work. The parking ticket was valid...and our neighbour isn't questioning that. However, being a very busy builder who works long hours, he stuffed the FPN somewhere in his van and forgot all about it...until yesterday. Yes, yesterday...I noticed that his car (not the van guilty of the original offence) had been clamped. I looked around and could not for the life of me see on what grounds...there appeared to be none. I later bumped into my (very glum looking) neighbour and asked him about this...and...wait for this...


He told me that, because he had failed to pay the original FPN (which was for something like ?60), Southwark had since got his property "tracked"...in this case his car...and clamped it. How much do you think it is going to cost him to get the wheel clamp removed?


I'll take your guesses...


Clue: more than ?100

Ladymuck, this happened to me this on monday morning, I ended up paying ?446 to get the clamp off my car - while i accept it was my own fault for stuffing the ticket in the back of my glove compartment - i never once recieved a reminder letter not even the one that tells you the PCN has gone to ?100..... I won't be stuffing tickets anywhere from now on other than in my purse - to pay....

DonGee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladymuck, this happened to me this on monday

> morning, I ended up paying ?446 to get the clamp

> off my car - while i accept it was my own fault

> for stuffing the ticket in the back of my glove

> compartment - i never once recieved a reminder

> letter not even the one that tells you the PCN has

> gone to ?100..... I won't be stuffing tickets

> anywhere from now on other than in my purse - to

> pay....


Well DonGee...my neighbour didn't receive a reminder either...it's disgraceful...


If it makes you feel any better though,whilst I'm sorry for you (thinking of all the hours you had to work to earn that)... Urrrgggh...my neighbour paid more than ?446...yep...keep guessing everyone...

There are rules against this, it was on Watchdog 12-18months back, just need to get support behind it ... ilke with bank charges etc, a charge is understandable, but the amount they stretch it to .. in excess of ?446 in this example ... for what they have done work wise, and what you have done "wrong-wise" is ridiculous. I mean, people get fined less for criminal offences !!

TheAllSeeingEye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are rules against this, it was on Watchdog

> 12-18months back, just need to get support behind

> it ... ilke with bank charges etc, a charge is

> understandable, but the amount they stretch it to

> .. in excess of ?446 in this example ... for what

> they have done work wise, and what you have done

> "wrong-wise" is ridiculous. I mean, people get

> fined less for criminal offences !!


Quite! Well, I'll tell you, my neighbour got fined...deep breath now...?680! Yes, that's six hundred and eighty pounds...if that isn't extortionate, then I really don't know what is. Disgraceful.

Parking wardens are usually foreign workers who only do this job because it's all they can get. Quite often they are very educated people, yet they have to put up with all sorts of terrible abuse. I rarely ever get parking tickets, and do you know why? Because I pay attention to parking regulations. It's not hard.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I rarely ever get parking tickets, and do

> you know why? Because I pay attention to parking

> regulations. It's not hard.


It is if you come across these signs, of which there are many in central London: http://www.barnetresidentsassociation.org.uk/bra/files/parking-sign.png

I once parked down a road with bays marked 8:30am - 6:30pm all the way down the very long road

I didn't notice that the last bay they had changed the times to 8:30am -8:30pm... It was dusk. Had i seen the change of course i would never have parked there. Still it was my error but it seemed quite sneaky and it was a genuine mistake.


Then i got a ticket parking next to a 'dropped pavement'. I've never even heard of a dropped pavement. There were no yellow or red lines to speak of. It didn't cross my mind that you weren't allowed to park there.


Anyway - both my fault but through sheer mistake and not malice or laziness. ?120 seems like a hefty fine for two genuine mistakes?

oh my gosh, ?680... it's sickening. Whats more is the breakdown of the costs they give you. ?80 for van rental, petrol and insurance. I sure will be looking into trying to get some of it back - how lucky successful i'll be is another thing.


What makes it worse for me is I never get parking tickets.

DonGee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh my gosh, ?680... it's sickening. Whats more is

> the breakdown of the costs they give you. ?80 for

> van rental, petrol and insurance. I sure will be

> looking into trying to get some of it back - how

> lucky successful i'll be is another thing.

>

> What makes it worse for me is I never get parking

> tickets.



Yes, as I said...pure extortion. Most of us accept that illegal parking/non-payment of fines incurs fines...but it is the amount of these fines which are - in my view - criminal. Hope you manage to get some of yours back. Let us all know. Good luck.

Be ahead of the "Licensed/certified Bailiff "( ?10k to purchase this license) as he likes to be know, thug debt collector is a better term.

He will have you believe he's from the court, he's not. Actually he represents his client the Council in a civil matter & his powers are quite limited, so he's a chancer preying on un-collected civil debts such as easy money parking tickets. ( Remember he is a high pressure negative sales man and gets commission/bonuses from his company for fees/sales generated )

Ask him/them to see his badge ( if you can, film him on your phone ) a court Crown bailiff will have a metal cop like badge. ( This is the one not to mess with, co-opperate with him ..oh & he only adds the statutory ?25 or for his visit also he can let you pay fee free the original costs over time) but he ( the thug DC )cant and wont have one.


So ask to see his paper license, now copy/photograph it. In his hand is a civil enforcement ( they have technically bought the debt & add "charges" of their own) now they will try ,lie , wrench your arm up your back to get you to agree to pay for the "service" that you are faced with.

These charges are not claimable by them in court, call the police if you feel intimidated; Also they have no rights to enter your home, even to make a list (another trick)


Don't pay them , don't enter into any form of payment scheme with them & don't let them cross your thresh-hold even one bit. If you have the guts for it tell them to "***off" and that you won't pay them,because don't forget you have not actually been to court so you are not breaking the law are you. You have not requested their services or entered into a contract verbal or other wise.


*Note if you do agree a payment scheme with them and miss in any way a term or payment, then they can heap on the extra extortionate charges legally , this is the second strategy they try to employ, resist at all costs


Plus, with the council, once they have engaged their services, they will have to pay to get out of it, so you will get no love there.


It's worth noting that even at this late stage you can go to back the TEC in Northampton and make a retrospective claim. Call them , they will e-mail you the forms,once you do this by fax they will notify the council who then call off the thugs straight away, also you can appeal as many times as you like & this can run for many years


As a defense; You may never have recived the "Notice to driver" who knows, this is for them to prove as they only send it by normal post so it can easily go amiss, if this is the case you get to revert the fine back to the original ?60 cost BTW


Lastly in the end the thugs will hand back the debt to the council marked "un-enforceable", you are not a criminal, it's a civil matter. Remember always be prepared to try to pay the council as your debt is with them.


Finaly to avoid this stress, technically "sell & leaseback" your goods to this company, if & when the balif does arrive you own "nothing" and have a bill of sale/ lease agreement to prove it


.....and boy does that feel gooooood



http://www.mysecuresentinel.com/securesentinel/personal-property-protection.dot




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...