Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *wispers to MM it's not really a revelation* ;-)


*whispers to KK*

I could be wrong, but I think Mick Mac is being funny here (as in ha ha ha)...part of his charm you know...bless his little cotton socks

  • 3 weeks later...
I posted a msg about a reports of a wierd woman in peckham rye park allegedly trying to feed poisoned treats to dogs. the posting seems to have been deleted. why is this? as a dog walker on the rye, I can assure you that the dog owners are all really concerned about it. I wanted to know if anyone knew about it. it seems I shall never find out. perhaps a list of prohibitions could be published, as you chucked out an perfectly innocent enquiry about water main works in friern road last week. I am aware of your intensely liberal attitude to knife wielding young people in lordship lane, but a forum is a place for all sorts of thoughts, likes, dislikes and attitudes. if there are to be restrictions based on your hostility to some of us then maybe you should look at yourself.

Erm...puzzled...do you mean this thread?


messagemad woman in peckham rye park

Posted by: puzzled Yesterday, 05:20PM


much anxiety among dog walkers in this park. they have been warned that a strange woman with long grey hair is trying to feed poisoned snacks to the dogs. can't find anyone who has sen her. might be another urban myth like the peckham panther or the surrey puma, but if is true it is really terrifying.


Because it is still there...it is in the Lounge...

  • Administrator

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> how 'private' are private messages?


The only people to read them are the sender and the recipient, even the email message that says "you have a new private message" does not contain the message (although it does contain the subject line).


I hope that answers your question.

Hello -


Has there been a cull of older messages? I've been trying to track down a couple of tradespeople that I've found on the EDF, at least one of whom I also recommended on the forum a couple of years ago -- have searched my own messages (which end at 2008 for some reason) and also every possible keyword combination -- but no dice. Is this a blip, or have some messages been wiped?


Thanks


Agathoise

The search defaults to 'last 30 days'. Make sure you do 'all time', or whatever it says, on the drop down in the search page. Or you an search for your own messages instead of key words.


It'll be there somewhere. You could even try on google as most of our content is cached on there too.

Hi MP -- and thanks for your response. I have searched for all words, all dates; I have pulled up all of my mss through the search, I've also gone into my own mss through my profile (I used to build search engines so know a little about getting the most out of DBs :-). My own messages cut off the first 25 or so postings I made on the EDF (including the ones I was looking for -- there are only 50-odd messages showingout or 75 that I've posted). No worries -- I've found the phone numbers I needed elsewhere -- but there is definitely a black hole somewhere in the EDF!


Interestingly, the Google cached results don't have what I'm looking for either, so the postings (and the threads they were in) may have been lost a few months ago.


Cheers,


Agathoise

  • Administrator

Hi


Last week we had a clean up of the forum database and posts in the wanted section over 6 months old were deleted. The database was 1.4Gb in size and now it's half that and the forum's running quicker.


Google cache does not cache the forum.


Sorry for any inconvenience but we had to loose the old messages.

  • Administrator

Hi RosieH


Creating a Tedious Smut Room would only encourage it which is not something we wish to do, we would prefer it to be ignored and have to retreat from the forum, rather like someone with an awkward "I've got Chlamydia" tattoo on their forehead at an orgy.

Dear rosieH


I suspect that the request for a separate room is not a serious one, but your intent is to raise the issue which bothers you into the public domain. As I was the OP for the naughtiness thread, and I know this one in particular bothers you because you've raised it before, I feel I need to respond. First of all, i am against any post that breaks forum rules, is offensive or personal, pornographic, or anything else which may be hurtful or offensive to others. The humour on the naughtiness thread and one or two others (but certainly not the majority) is certainly not to everyones liking and may be distasteful to some. I can relate totally to this as I too find some threads to be tedious and sometimes distasteful. My own response to such threads - and the response of most people I guess - is to simply ignore them, as Admin suggests you do in this case. This forum thrives because of the diversity it's users bring and I think it is much the better for it.




Are you coming to the drinks on Friday? I would like to say hi and I promise I won't be smutty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years      
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...