Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Roman burial grounds were either generally in a necropolis (city of the dead) or, very frequently along the roads leading out of towns as in Rome (they were always initially placed outside town limits, although the towns could then expand to incorporate them).


I wouldn't have thought that Dawson Heights was either an obvious site for a necropolis or lay along a Roman Road. Indeed, I am not sure what Roman Settlement they would be outside - Londinium was too far away and on the other side of the Thames - and although there is some suggestion of Roman settlement at Greenwich that too is too far away from here to count.


There may have been burials at Dawson Heights - presumably pagan since there is no church there I believe for Christian burial (normally around a church until the 19th Century municipal cemeteries). But the (close) Camberwell Old Cemetery would be, and indeed was, a much more obvious location for burial.


But I would be happy to stand corrected.

I would be very surprised if this site was a roman burial ground. The Romans traditionally buried the dead just outside the town Walls, which is why there were roman remains found in spitalfields. The cemetries would also be close to main roads. I'm not aware of any roman roads or roman settlements or forts in this area (although I may be mistaken). Most roman activity south of the river focused around Borough and along the modern A2 through Greenwich. If there were any ancient settlements on Dawsons Heights, it would possibly be Iron Age due to it's dominating position in the area.


I don't want to spoil a good ghost story though!

Sorry to disappoint you guys. I work for the association that now owns Dawson Heights. We invited the architect around for a press visit last year and she was in glowing health. We have plenty of pics (see page 5 of this newsletter).


http://www.shgroup.org.uk/Documents/Publications/On%20Board/OnBoard42Aug08FINAL.pdf

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What actually is Dawson Heights, where is it and

> why is it so special? I have always wondered. :)


It's the big building up on the hill on the Forest Hill side of ED, here's a panorama of the view from there, with East Dulwich in the foreground on New Years Day this year.


panarama01jan2010-sml.jpg


Here's a link to a larger 3.5Mb version, it's compressed at 40% jpg to keep the file size down so the quality's not brilliant but you can still see your bedroom window. Maybe.


And you can see the Dome, Wembley stadium, the wheel, Earls Court, St Pauls etc, it really is worth going up there on a clear day. I didn't see any dead Romans though.


ryedalema, I'd love to take a picture from right at the top, as would a few others I'm sure, so if that's ever possible please let us know, we'd be eternally grateful.

Dawson Heights is an estate of ex council blocks on Overhill Road and the land in front of it furnishes the viewer with the best views of London. To my mind it beats Primrose Hill views any day of the week. Even better views can be seen from Canonbie Road - or better still the back gardens of the people who live round there, but Dawson Heights is brilliant.

I've not been in any of the flats but often ride past there and stop to have a grin break*. Seeing New Year in from there is a regular thing too, indeed pretty much every twelve months.


*I don't smoke.

The site used to be a farm with a farm house atop from around the 17th century.


I remember in the 80's there was an urban legend of some-one jumping off the top as they had done some Acid and thought they could fly. There is a bent metal rail where they were have supposed to have landed on the Dunstan rd end.

Dawson's Heights blocks of flats was built to Council standard for the Council as housing stock.

I have personal memories of Dawsons Hill a natural clay hill on a very steep gradient, sloping from Overhill Road to Dunstan's Road. The only building on the lower part at Dunstan's Road was a small block of flats.

There was a rough road leading onto a row of about ten pre-war terraced houses some way back from Overhill Road, behind these were some twenty lock up garages, then an opening leading to the green rough hillside. Here the workmen employed by the Estate Agents dumped the rubbish for many years, we used to use anything large enough to sit on slid down the hill

One of the local Estate Agents who had at a later date their Estate sales Office facing Peckham Rye, near Brunton & Williams Printing Factory. This agent who lived in Overhill Road , her house is still there it can be picked out as it is a square white building completely out of character nearly facing the now called Dawson's Heights.

The site was never developed as it was too steep for services to gain access, everybody used it as a local open space, I used it from about 1938 myself.

There was a Police Building built near entrance in Overhill Road, and my brother in law lived facing it, where we were always calling there, giving us plenty of time to use the hill.

Personally I think it unlikely that it would have been used as a Bronze Age burial site, as the buried bodies would after years become dislodged and exposed from the unstable clay steep hillside.

The mention of moving excavated materials from the railway is not a thing that would be considered as the transport in those day would be mostly Horse drawn, it would be a hard task to transport the spoil to the top of a hill, it could become unstable end cause a landslide.

The back alleyway Donkey Passage from Goodrich Road has only gained that name a short while ago.


There is a hill that was called Furze Hill a green open area behind Horniman?s Park now built on and is called Westwood Park an estate of houses. I could recall memories told to me of the Zeppelin Airship that was kept there the securing rings were visible there until the development.

I would be interested in any personal recollections of Dawson's Hill.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...