Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst I'm quite capable of dealing with this myself I'd appreciate some help here. For some reason, in the past few years I keep getting asked to be godfather to peoples kids. I'm not sure why.... I don't know that many people, am not especially religious nor do I possess any special qualities. I appreciate it is probably flattering to be asked but I'm also baffled to be honest. Why me?


On my first acceptance I read something at church and I gave a suitable present but to my shame I've been a rubbish godfather since, forgetting birthdays, Christmases etc mainly due to having too much committed elsewhere in life. I figure when she gets into probs later as a young adult I'd be able to help better. I'm not even sure what the modern role of a godfather should be these days - should it not be more about moral guidance than presents?


Anyways.... I think I'm about to be asked to be Godfather again and given the above is there a correct way to politely decline without causing too much offence?


All answers gratefully received!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9636-the-godfather-again/
Share on other sites

yeah its a tough one mr ben and I sypathise with your dilemma.....not sure what the best way to politely decline is...perhaps you could elaborate on the huge amount of commitments and very little spare time you have these days and put them off asking you.


i think the modern role of godfather/mother seems to be buying them really extra-special pressies on significant birthdays...and being there for them if you had to. best of luck!

Men are crap at godfathering, as we never remember birthdays, nor the godchilds name age and address.


I am just not equipped to undertake the responsibility, as I am a lazy selfish bum, and I also feel it is a particularly useless and pointless role!


Other than that of course I wouldn't hesitate.

Clue's in the title: your job is to pray for little Johnny/Miranda and keep an eye on their spiritual development - same as it's always been.


You could easily decline on the grounds that you have no strong religious feelings. 'Renouncing the Devil, et' is pretty strong stuff, so if you don't believe it, don't do it.


I suspect that apart from being a jolly nice chap, you are stinking rich hence all the requests.

on a recent trip home, various discussions broke out about who my godparents were. All of the likely suspects were involved but no-one could be sure so we just shrugged and moved on


Moral is: godparents = nothing to sweat about


But the fact that you have several godchildren already should be reason enough and if the person asking you this time isn't aware enough to take that on board, what kind of friend are they?

"Of course, you realise when she's 18 I'm likely to still be single, and only in my mid-forties." (twiddle moustache)


"I'd love to. It would be great to have someone to take along to the local mum'n'toddler groups; there's some fierce MILF talent just waiting to be tapped up there."


"Godfather yeah? Cool. Rock up about church o'clock yeah? Say the vows? Hit the champers. Job's a good 'un. I can make a speech if you like. My improv at Jez's 30th went down a storm, right."

Maybe we do things a little different where I?m from but normally a godparent should be a sibling or cousin of one of the parents or a very close family friend.


The most important thing is that it is someone who will take a moral responsibility for the child should anything happen to the parents.


Other than that all it really just entails if a banknote in a birthday card once a year and attendance at certain events like 21st birthdays, weddings, confirmations, bar mitzvahs, trials etc.

I'm a godfather to my eldest nephew and to my eternal shame I've done absolutely nothing 'special' for him that is different to how I've treated my other nephews and nieces. Mainly because, like the OP, I've never really known how to do the 'godfather' role. He's 25 now so its all a bit late to do anything, anyway!

No I?m not confusing them. A designated legal guardian is someone who takes over care for a child if something happens to the parents.


This is different to a godparent whose role is of moral support. (at least in my understanding)


Although there is nothing to say that a godparent can?t also be a guardian.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In Catholicism the godparent must be Catholic,

> which kind of suggests that the chief role is

> religious indoctrination.


Balls. I'm catholic and neither of my godparents are. They were there all present and correct at my christening next to the priest in St Patrick?s. I?ve seen the pictures.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In Catholicism the godparent must be Catholic,

> which kind of suggests that the chief role is

> religious indoctrination.


no its not, my eldest girls godfather is c of e, father john didn,t bat an eye.

Nope the Huguenots have it. In a catholic baptism one of the godparents must be a practicising catholic over sixteen who has taken the Eucharist.


I have the whole joy of 'the christening' conversation to come soon with the devout irish catholic ma in law.

'what do you mean you're not, he'll go to limbo* or whatever).'

'hmm, that kind of attitude was kind of a clincher for me you see'


current catholic doctrine says that he might go to

heaven, I like the ambiguity there, just to say, see we're not bad everything really is nice and fluffy really...probably, but you might burn in hell if you don't you sinners!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...